[v6ops] Update IPv6 Wireline Incremental

Victor Kuarsingh <victor.kuarsingh@gmail.com> Mon, 03 October 2011 23:12 UTC

Return-Path: <victor.kuarsingh@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E68F721F8D37 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 16:12:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ckdL521uTbHP for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 16:12:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EDAC21F8D2C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 16:12:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gyd12 with SMTP id 12so4900886gyd.31 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=20krQpiu7Yo9IZGnQNjkKiLS6EO5xM/5eqj3GuWGcBc=; b=onulyV43C2IVfu26wkjpGvB/V1hV7RT2+6sz2hH9G8TatuOTy73hPPI5YKr2Pgt4mE ++3a1IjuRmUIMDG9kFhqMVG4wN/iRsyHT3DtbwniZvuuDJn9qpv8SI4yUC/zPOQ+82q4 wzseV5ay8tRY1yCVTtrBlkMPVh9UFlcq4cjYI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.19.42 with SMTP id b10mr2513110pbe.83.1317683742572; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.50.104 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 16:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 19:15:42 -0400
Message-ID: <CADiurz3-Spt-6o8U_fmMRLVvGrkD_CHkWQFfQDOEzrL++L15cQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Victor Kuarsingh <victor.kuarsingh@gmail.com>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec5215e5167023c04ae6d2757"
Subject: [v6ops] Update IPv6 Wireline Incremental
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 23:12:40 -0000

WG,

Updated version of draft-kuarsingh-wireline-incremental-ipv6-01.

The intent here is to provide a potential path for Wireline Operators who
may be looking to support IPv6 in an incremental fashion but may not be
fully up to speed on all the various technologies out there, or may not have
a full grasp on how to boil it down to a potential plan for their network.

The draft also presents a view on what technologies may be used to solve
some of the issues the face many operators over the next few years
(introduction of IPv6, infancy IPv6 on access network equipment, exhaustion
of IPv4,  future optimizations etc).

This also attempts to build on the v4v6framework draft
(draft-ietf-v6ops-v4v6tran-framework)

Future version will also supply further suggestions on some deployment
considerations including diagrams.

Comments, suggestions and attacks welcome.

regards,

Victor Kuarsingh