Re: Proposed agenda for IPv6 Operations - IETF 77

[Fred Baker <[e-mail]>]

I have a question on these.

Per the abstract of VET, "VET can also be considered as version 2 of the Intra-Site Automatic Tunnel Addressing Protocol (i.e., "ISATAPv2")." I tend to agree; with routing, next hop determination, and a "Subnetwork Encapsulation and Adaptation Layer (SEAL)", I don't think this is an operational description. I think this belongs discussed in rrg, rtgarea/rtgwg, or *maybe* int-area.

How about you and I discuss this Monday and you convince me that this is within the charter of IPv6 Operations. I think it is that which was explicitly placed outside the charter - transitional technologies and protocol development.


On Mar 20, 2010, at 2:31 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote:

> Fred,
>  
> The new agenda posted on the webpages does not seem to match the one
> you posted to the list:
>  
>   http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/10mar/agenda/v6ops.html
>  
> Seeing that there are new additions, I would like to propose to add the
> RANGER, VET and SEAL trilogy – preferably as the final session on
> Friday, as I have two other conflicts for the earlier portion of that session.
> The talk would require 15min, and would cover all three documents
> together (i.e., not as three separate talks). The documents are here:
>  
>   http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5720.txt
>   http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-templin-intarea-vet
>   http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-templin-intarea-seal
>  
> Thanks – Fred
> [e-mail]
>  
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Fred Baker
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 2:06 PM
> To: IPv6 Operations
> Subject: Proposed agenda for IPv6 Operations - IETF 77
>  
> Comments please... Basically I am putting three security issues and two 3GPP-relevant drafts on Monday morning and the remainder on Friday morning. Each discussion gets about half an hour. If time permits in the meeting, I'll pull agenda items forward from Friday to Monday. I have two drafts on here that were not marked for v6ops but the authors asked me to include; next time I'd appreciate it if folks used the draft-*-v6ops-* naming convention; it makes my job easier. If I have missed anything, let me know.
> IPv6 Operations - IETF 77
> 
> Monday 22 March, 9:00 AM
> 
> Agenda bashing
>  
> Recommended Simple Security Capabilities in Customer Premises Equipment for Providing Residential IPv6 Internet Service
> 18-Feb-10, <draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-09.txt>
> Advanced Security for IPv6 CPE
> 8-Mar-10, <draft-vyncke-advanced-ipv6-security-01.txt>
> Routing Loops using ISATAP and 6to4: Problem Statement and Proposed Solutions
> 1-Feb-10, <draft-nakibly-v6ops-tunnel-loops-01.txt>
>  
> IPv6 in 3GPP Evolved Packet System
> 24-Feb-10, <draft-korhonen-v6ops-3gpp-eps-01.txt>
> Mobile Networks Considerations for IPv6 Deployment
> 8-Mar-10, <draft-koodli-ipv6-in-mobile-networks-01.txt>
> Friday 26 March, 9:00 AM
> 
> Emerging Service Provider Scenarios for IPv6 Deployment
> 23-Feb-10, <draft-carpenter-v6ops-isp-scenarios-01.txt>
> Unicast Transmission of IPv6 Multicast Messages on Link-layer
> 15-Feb-10, <draft-gundavelli-v6ops-l2-unicast-00.txt>
> Neighbor Cache Protection in Neighbor Discovery Protocol
> 2-Mar-10, <draft-jiang-v6ops-nc-protection-01.txt>
> DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation as IPv6 Migration Tool in Cellular Networks
> 16-Feb-10, <draft-sarikaya-v6ops-prefix-delegation-00.txt>
> Advanced Requirements for IPv6 Customer Edge Routers
> 8-Mar-10, <draft-wbeebee-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis-02.txt>
>  
>  
> http://www.ipinc.net/IPv4.GIF
>  

http://www.ipinc.net/IPv4.GIF