IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] About draft-horley-v6ops-expand-doc

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 02 June 2021 21:12 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218873A1B73 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 14:12:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tQiMA-3UjHmZ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 14:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42a.google.com (mail-pf1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB68D3A1B72 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 14:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id g6so3215172pfq.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 14:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=08ZCTTq+KUyeqUZg54SsPFBQLJLshPjAX33as3pfZsE=; b=t4zjkqSvbhP3RSFeAfgex9GuXFxq3Y0y215dblCoYlhZNp9uNAubtfheayjM/sPlSR JboMuo36g2WAcYNb8UYwL/bUoS+f+dJ0vf3QIOLdQS1iJ19XOJiJW9HQ6aKQJxhSxy8e Vb4SVUe3BSAeXJyGmLh4V8Fsyth/q9EMCzpsklZYtTsDFwW0Y9o1gByHe5gyEerx4xWP k6Qz8bXIOZNSwHoKzjzLbbPZkXz05cNbodWr0tShhTOAfSqMdbV+Oxi55uCnMZTTOhIV tsLKGJ0cJ147jGXDW0cjLbtn4jrA7lMgHjCaeXxB+hvGcTvj90fTmuGvoCmWtbpj6EOm Jf9g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=08ZCTTq+KUyeqUZg54SsPFBQLJLshPjAX33as3pfZsE=; b=aiEK3dZEb+SriaUW8MfR+yUUpdjbbGBaYpaiK2ACTXL5RSWZNtIshu6VMbD/JrmtSK YHlxyKYGFhnyCebxBtn73DCr3pVbLq6UDjTHpsrv3zDP9VaLV+mBvMIaZVgWZZJpee43 hEHspgw+psE90I1jap/S4CVjDARx3kaVHC8TeowYx+dHCvia+lCBO1gkY6W380AAAyxI sfxi2alXiyLowR8KJJvYHg44TbZb/gcocydIUwptX/kadbbLDFsxO0cS0sg5hSEgibOa k7p91G72hggRpSNZ8vpOu8rwhmskV3K5LEO+oF0gEfU8xGo8TPCL2IdeGMTMjDmst7jc f+2g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530cJ+SFYDobQQ8F5/WM9pQbFwhkhkN2TW1oJTliY0xWp5xRsbpV gD9Q0Jb1XSXhpGhi/ZLkZmgmHjtoO1v7fw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzWqXpnt0h4v0x1IfWwOFXLuor0s58a3AvDLQSSt7fVJYZRgFq9SaAj6Pt9dMol3Ng4jKKaoA==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:ba18:: with SMTP id k24mr3456754pgf.65.1622668363615; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 14:12:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:100d:901:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:100d:901:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w63sm434188pfw.153.2021.06.02.14.12.42 for <v6ops@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Jun 2021 14:12:43 -0700 (PDT)
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <84C5D303-07C7-4E7B-8DB2-0593F9159831@cisco.com> <CAE=N4xcuA6-9t_TJCU0GBVZbci06z0f8S40a2aKu3Fh0MeyGOg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMGpriU_bxALPkKTGD=Pt8+wz=BuCfLbvtHMcF7JC02+D-r-4Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <d31cd4c7-4833-e096-146a-2917948656e7@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 09:12:39 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMGpriU_bxALPkKTGD=Pt8+wz=BuCfLbvtHMcF7JC02+D-r-4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/TO4VAs5yH2_WsfFZKIMHtaRMTlw>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] About draft-horley-v6ops-expand-doc
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 21:12:49 -0000

Hi Erik,

I have no skin in this game, but:

>> An example of this limitation is apparent when doumenting a multi-provder ISP network address plan.

seems like a clear motivation for something shorter than /32, since /32 is a common size for ISP allocations (see ripe-738 for example). Agreed, a 
/24 might be enough.

Alternatively, of course, if the discussion of 0200::/7 as a "lab prefix" 
went anywhere, it could also be used as a doc prefix.

Regards
   Brian Carpenter

On 03-Jun-21 07:32, Erik Kline wrote:
> <no hats>
> 
> The document says that the current /32 is not big enough.  There is one example ("doumenting [sic] a multi-provder [sic] ISP network") that was begun but never used to motivate what size is really needed.  Right now it basically says "/32 is too small, let's use this old /16".
> 
> I think the document probably needs to provide a rationale for what size is actually needed.  Maybe /16 is too big -- or even too small!
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email