[v6ops] Comment on draft-horley-v6ops-expand-doc
Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 05 August 2021 08:14 UTC
Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88AF03A15E7; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 01:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PPzUsa_xYRMC; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 01:14:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x731.google.com (mail-qk1-x731.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::731]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EC383A15E6; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 01:14:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x731.google.com with SMTP id az7so5436638qkb.5; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 01:14:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:cc:to; bh=42I6DzC3soFKT9Ca+Vgdqpqxj7y3aZJgojdR+9NAfBE=; b=jQz3c3UZsUeTEFEnfBddIAPJPvO+qbv6k2UFo4M/iH9A54GIEd1bWOzDWqwq901CsI miAPAMw+/kY1sn6KFS8cP2s0bRerZtMbzkzN5/If/NcbbvkDkQ57ymzQvYcGs5Z5t34q f+dpm3h+aVHQ52QqHHgwRhAUSUFIeLTs80yZZU8j+3+sK/lvNkoe10svryHl+3Inr2M8 0cNDAVqYkKUCHznpSfbLlbTaWhlOz99Zs7dpbXdKo/+K1NCjIIJDDUVlGNp08SmYGOWD wv7Ltw1EAVrEBKl4s2dReZfJ9GcL2rC2NXb0FXxyQw2qRagILcec0i7zDGPYs3HI+Nm3 T9mg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:cc:to; bh=42I6DzC3soFKT9Ca+Vgdqpqxj7y3aZJgojdR+9NAfBE=; b=dlgd6bu7UE7/QtzSrkG+yrztgw/HqnvTB9/SSEzCobJDDY+1je3lTbKRL8VBcDH0/o L0Stw5Mcpb+Zk+AcnJkuwErKcVlc/xIk+jlxxjDumAx2GXJmhi7n9llOI4r5HvVM3S/S mN3a7Wr32hr0Io+cfdl7eotGyP3DfbN0LbL3YIQBWw9VupQUWsTEgs1dWi6W2NRMhMYR flxV4TY/1CQSLn6FLeNqjhlvZLFgragx+/ZvJ7Mc53nG3CCneyt0nsB7S8Qb1z6xv2U9 6JeFsgjrvwULlVblDj7PnjKgOE6c81ZrMjKE6e+S9vhuJp9EWdryW8LwawsJA+1ie676 bFSA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531nIpkf3nHg0QNtJshJOMLmEE9u+fL+gYyLkN08m1WsxsqAOgns 684xnI596EGZDxCD/8VFLpGa09z4cUE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz3zUKMAqr74GjGqVPa2++vjAxP6YtCGh1SaGwL1MGpvS33klE1qpqu6EivJ1u8xNUqXyXJsg==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:c12:: with SMTP id 18mr3625038qkm.384.1628151239947; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 01:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2600:1702:290:6530:896e:782a:ed59:777f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bj36sm1854900qkb.51.2021.08.05.01.13.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Aug 2021 01:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_93E08A40-4A82-4D46-AEFE-3A2DD6B4EE4A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
Message-Id: <435E3B19-071C-4E00-8FD7-4C177628DB45@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 01:13:57 -0700
Cc: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
To: draft-horley-v6ops-expand-doc.all@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Ugj2n2-WcLbAuCwdCZoMfo-rW2c>
Subject: [v6ops] Comment on draft-horley-v6ops-expand-doc
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 08:14:10 -0000
We have been over this before. The outcome last time we went through it, as I recall, was that "there is always a required prefix size that is larger than whatever has been chosen". My perspective is that the traditional 2001:db8... prefix could be extended to a /36 or /24, and the cases in which one needs two prefixes larger than /32 can be handled by analogy; "I want a prefix that is 12 bit long and another that is 11 bits long, non-overlapping" can be handled by allowing two prefixes longer than /32 and noting in the test-or-whatever "if you need to, insert your own prefixes here".