IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-shishio-v6ops-dpvt

Ivan Pepelnjak <ipepelnjak@gmail.com> Tue, 26 February 2013 18:49 UTC

Return-Path: <ipepelnjak@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD0B21F8970 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:49:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id noS-MOAqnMDk for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:49:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ee0-f42.google.com (mail-ee0-f42.google.com [74.125.83.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644C021F88E3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:49:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ee0-f42.google.com with SMTP id b47so2717649eek.29 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:49:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=J9oi9wL6nQ2Bjtq6D7F0H5sOZEUTzn0u+mq8YcDwXqM=; b=rJzwkYydAB0HDzDsRjHaw9PeY8ztn1BqR3S1c4Yit4f/sPKYiOg0Rj4BZx8rcFMzB3 vR55JH2kM2Bgg0+7f2Spnj8WwkYwjf7ThGCDf/MGJ5tTSKcQH2qJj6VyPmy4gshg7hpk N1Bi/T4zc6o6qrjc16yxf/PfrewDxU0srecjsjrWsj1qcVS3Ox64KP+YpBD5Mp2u05ct pDUoA0DBfMl+InoRz59IZhGCglGGFUx5rJAnl69p1LF9THEB/6CPlmwvTHTtLppjVUGV WIz311W7osYdT1vTPhKrQL32Cl5hV0duxZxv08rcumL1uJ1MIyBDlBdx5ATpRj00BrHE Fl5g==
X-Received: by 10.14.207.73 with SMTP id m49mr52690034eeo.24.1361904560591; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:49:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Ivans-MacBook-Air.local (83-215-81-109.stjo.dyn.salzburg-online.at. [83.215.81.109]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r4sm2833770eeo.12.2013.02.26.10.49.19 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:49:19 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <512D03AC.5050005@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:49:16 +0100
From: Ivan Pepelnjak <ipepelnjak@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130216 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <201302181345.r1IDj0J04495@ftpeng-update.cisco.com> <1808340F7EC362469DDFFB112B37E2FCC6CFB3BC8A@SRVHKE02.rdm.cz> <51239D09.10305@cisco.com> <1808340F7EC362469DDFFB112B37E2FCC6CFB3BF8F@SRVHKE02.rdm.cz> <5126BA74.5080508@cisco.com> <B823D57C-F630-42D6-B4DF-BCFF60ACBB21@delong.com> <CAKD1Yr2JMjcP7EoSeXfNyw3RB1eKRfyBVBW6vM_jU6ApW1kweg@mail.gmail.com> <B0FEE42A-03BD-41DC-98E9-68DAF1C89A4A@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <B0FEE42A-03BD-41DC-98E9-68DAF1C89A4A@delong.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-shishio-v6ops-dpvt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:49:22 -0000

On 26.02.2013 19:39 , Owen DeLong wrote:
[...]
> It would be one thing if issuing such longer prefixes actually provided
> some benefit, but the reality is that it does not. All it does is make
> future innovation more difficult and reduce the utility of the network.

Years after a similar comment on my blog I'm still waiting for a sample 
of innovation being stifled by residential end-user prefixes longer than 
/48.

Ivan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email