IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-anderson-v6ops-siit-dc-01

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 09 December 2014 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA781A00B7 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 07:27:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vo3e0u8CwaSy for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 07:27:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B99F71A0222 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 07:27:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1286; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1418138822; x=1419348422; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=4ldYoMfXJjO/0gH2qQ6Gf6CiM1nXW3aOoybuQ/yKtSA=; b=XNWim0deDYUeOJpJsasdTv9pNVVUABLG8VJMrTC/C33LO1lL6EGnVuZK NYXD6ZbFAax1ZuRsJzq+f/3GyTEvzP1pYNeqEyd9Ki7ULUhzJ30TfS4EU v0375NgbyRK3oaHHA62O/7qz6EPzezQSXT/wutXUZ4loW6EYKAA7mA/CG k=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 195
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ai0FAIoTh1StJA2H/2dsb2JhbABZgwaBKgTMJgKBIxYBAQEBAX2EAwEBAwF5BQsCAQhGMiUCBAENBQ6IIgjXOQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAReQPAeDIYEVAQSODYFigSiGC5Fqg25vgUV+AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,545,1413244800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="104061371"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Dec 2014 15:27:02 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com [173.36.12.88]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sB9FR1Nv026849 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 9 Dec 2014 15:27:02 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.118]) by xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com ([173.36.12.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:27:01 -0600
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>, Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draft-anderson-v6ops-siit-dc-01
Thread-Index: AQHQE8ST/H+52M+VBkKaVHnICYF0eQ==
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 15:27:00 +0000
Message-ID: <4609D998-6831-4C23-A009-FFD4409EBE5E@cisco.com>
References: <CAD6AjGQxHt=kDP0rBHx8mkkxkpsBubOLe+A0O84gz2q=_Omi7g@mail.gmail.com> <20141208094253.308df787@echo.ms.redpill-linpro.com> <CAD6AjGTjNnc7B2KzYuNYvis5_8nANp5QfEEpoSqt5S=HAutyGQ@mail.gmail.com> <20141209103706.2beb9c9a@echo.ms.redpill-linpro.com>
In-Reply-To: <20141209103706.2beb9c9a@echo.ms.redpill-linpro.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.117]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_46120FFE-E0CD-43A5-A302-3F223BB44B2B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/VXUpI2zMMuYl7jrUVkqnxGxiD8U
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-anderson-v6ops-siit-dc-01
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 15:27:08 -0000

On Dec 9, 2014, at 1:37 AM, Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no> wrote:

> I think I'd call this «Partial dual-stack» or somthing like it.

I suspect you’re both right, but in different ways. The particular machine(s) are dual stack (they have two stacks), but they have only IPv6 addresses on at least one interface (they might also have only IPv4 addresses on another interface, but that’s not a requirement). As a result, a message passing through is IPv4 on one side and IPv6 on another. But nothing else has to be dual stack. So the *network* is only partially dual stacked.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email