IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] MAC table shortage in IPv6 networks caused by multiple IPv6 prefixes/addresses//FW: New Version Notification for draft-liu-v6ops-running-multiple-prefixes-01.txt

"Liubing (Leo)" <leo.liubing@huawei.com> Mon, 14 July 2014 01:26 UTC

Return-Path: <leo.liubing@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A311A023F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Jul 2014 18:26:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.852
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.852 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nW5fxiIS66av for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Jul 2014 18:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B758F1A0218 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Jul 2014 18:26:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BJX74748; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 01:26:44 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from nkgeml409-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.40) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 02:26:43 +0100
Received: from NKGEML506-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.24]) by nkgeml409-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.40]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 09:26:39 +0800
From: "Liubing (Leo)" <leo.liubing@huawei.com>
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] MAC table shortage in IPv6 networks caused by multiple IPv6 prefixes/addresses//FW: New Version Notification for draft-liu-v6ops-running-multiple-prefixes-01.txt
Thread-Index: AQHPnPWZEoY/MBJp2UysHWGIZEB+RJueytfg
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 01:26:38 +0000
Message-ID: <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D8F2C70@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D8EEA21@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D8F1C32@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1407091226000.7929@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CFE32281.2067C%evyncke@cisco.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1407091710020.7929@uplift.swm.pp.se> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1407091840270.99248@ayourtch-mac> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D8F291C@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1407101220310.93503@ayourtch-mac> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D8F2AB4@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1407111029250.37292@ayourtch-mac> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D8F2AF9@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <27F9B16E-6026-42CC-A0C6-64687C6997F0@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <27F9B16E-6026-42CC-A0C6-64687C6997F0@puck.nether.net>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.98.132]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/WiwYRfGrjY3ev7Bbn-IO7t2u7w8
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] MAC table shortage in IPv6 networks caused by multiple IPv6 prefixes/addresses//FW: New Version Notification for draft-liu-v6ops-running-multiple-prefixes-01.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 01:26:47 -0000

Hi Jared,

> Apple believes the coexistence of slaac and dhcp6 are a problem and close
> defects as "3rd party problem won't fix" when raised with them.

[Bing] This is interesting. Would you mind providing a pointer for more detailed information? Does Apple consider dhcpv6/slaac co-existence as a problem in general, or just in some specific cases? 

Best regards,
Bing

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email