Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-jaeggli-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem-00.txt
Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Wed, 04 June 2014 21:49 UTC
Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5E71A032B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 14:49:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VCZIQljKY2rI for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 14:49:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0423E1A024F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 14:49:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from cupcake.foobar.org (xe-0-0-2.transit07.phb1.foobar.org [87.192.56.84]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.14.9/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s54Ln1C9031370 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 4 Jun 2014 22:49:02 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.netability.ie: Host xe-0-0-2.transit07.phb1.foobar.org [87.192.56.84] claimed to be cupcake.foobar.org
Message-ID: <538F944D.5080205@foobar.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 22:49:01 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <20140602072659.7433.89475.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <538E73EE.8050409@gmail.com> <538EA522.4060507@bogus.com> <538F8246.9000909@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <538F8246.9000909@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Wy3W0En8cx6MwuUnVEPRcpGpX6k
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, draft-jaeggli-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-jaeggli-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 21:49:17 -0000
On 04/06/2014 21:32, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > My logic is the number of hash buckets doesn't matter - it's the number > of paths, because if there are N paths, ~1/N of the traffic will go > along each path regardless of the number of hash buckets. on a matter of nits, the number of hash buckets matters greatly if it's too small, and there is lots of hardware deployed out on the internet which suffers from not enough hash buckets. Nick
- Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-jaeggli-v6ops-pmtud… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-jaeggli-v6ops-pmtud… joel jaeggli
- Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-jaeggli-v6ops-pmtud… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-jaeggli-v6ops-pmtud… Nick Hilliard
- Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-jaeggli-v6ops-pmtud… Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-jaeggli-v6ops-pmtud… joel jaeggli