IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison-02.txt

Lencse Gábor <lencse@hit.bme.hu> Thu, 24 January 2019 17:13 UTC

Return-Path: <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2AF131258 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 09:13:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V7gRmhONYaNu for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 09:13:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frogstar.hit.bme.hu (frogstar.hit.bme.hu [IPv6:2001:738:2001:4020::2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F00B013125A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 09:13:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.119] (host-79-121-41-152.kabelnet.hu [79.121.41.152]) (authenticated bits=0) by frogstar.hit.bme.hu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x0OHDRfM040984 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 18:13:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lencse@hit.bme.hu)
X-Authentication-Warning: frogstar.hit.bme.hu: Host host-79-121-41-152.kabelnet.hu [79.121.41.152] claimed to be [192.168.1.119]
References: <154834714560.29243.6650395366451478724.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org list" <v6ops@ietf.org>
From: Lencse Gábor <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <154834714560.29243.6650395366451478724.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <0a3ef70d-851e-f8ba-97d5-37186e8872f8@hit.bme.hu>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 18:13:24 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <154834714560.29243.6650395366451478724.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------E53B405503DE77D5CEDF5842"
Content-Language: en-US
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.101.0 at frogstar.hit.bme.hu
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Received-SPF: pass (frogstar.hit.bme.hu: authenticated connection) receiver=frogstar.hit.bme.hu; client-ip=79.121.41.152; helo=[192.168.1.119]; envelope-from=lencse@hit.bme.hu; x-software=spfmilter 2.001 http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/ with libspf2-1.2.10;
X-DCC--Metrics: frogstar.hit.bme.hu; whitelist
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 152.66.248.44
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/YacvuSGHBCMCpxocdwW_IyWtuOs>
Subject: [v6ops] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison-02.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:13:41 -0000

Dear v6ops Members,

We have revised our draft "Pros and Cons of IPv6 Transition Technologies 
for IPv4aaS" making significant changes including:

    o  Ian Farrer has joined us as an author.

    o  Restructuring: the description of the five IPv4aaS technologies
       was moved to a separate section.

    o  More details and figures were added to the description of the five
       IPv4aaS technologies.

    o  Section titled "High-level Architectures and their Consequences"
       has been completely rewritten.

    o  Several additions/clarification throughout Section titled
       "Detailed Analysis".

    o  Section titled "Performance Analysis" was dropped due to lack of
       results yet.

    o  Word based text ported to XML.

    o  Further text cleanups, added text on state sync and load
       balancing.  Additional comments inline that should be considered
       for future updates.

We kindly request your feedback.

Best regards,

Gábor Lencse

-------- Továbbított üzenet --------
Tárgy: 	New Version Notification for 
draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison-02.txt
Dátum: 	Thu, 24 Jan 2019 08:25:45 -0800
Feladó: 	internet-drafts@ietf.org
Címzett: 	Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org>, Jordi Palet Martinez 
<jordi.palet@theipv6company.com>, Ian Farrer <ian.farrer@telekom.de>, 
Jordi Palet <jordi.palet@theipv6company.com>, Gabor Lencse 
<lencse@hit.bme.hu>, Richard Patterson <richard.patterson@sky.uk>




A new version of I-D, draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison-02.txt
has been successfully submitted by Gabor Lencse and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name: draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison
Revision: 02
Title: Pros and Cons of IPv6 Transition Technologies for IPv4aaS
Document date: 2019-01-24
Group: Individual Submission
Pages: 23
URL: 
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison-02.txt
Status: 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison/
Htmlized: 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison-02
Htmlized: 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison
Diff: 
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison-02

Abstract:
Several IPv6 transition technologies have been developed to provide
customers with IPv4-as-a-Service (IPv4aaS) for ISPs with an IPv6-only
access and/or core network. All these technologies have their
advantages and disadvantages, and depending on existing topology,
skills, strategy and other preferences, one of these technologies may
be the most appropriate solution for a network operator.

This document examines the five most prominent IPv4aaS technologies
considering a number of different aspects to provide network
operators with an easy to use reference to assist in selecting the
technology that best suits their needs.



Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email