IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-gont-v6ops-ra-guard-evasion

Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> Mon, 13 February 2012 14:04 UTC

Return-Path: <jared@puck.nether.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF0E21F855F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:04:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IcWSGhPvb7av for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:04:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from puck.nether.net (puck.nether.net [IPv6:2001:418:3f4::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F37921F84AE for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:04:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.67.142.85] (mobile-166-147-099-210.mycingular.net [166.147.97.210] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by puck.nether.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1DE3YRq026391 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:03:35 -0500
References: <C9439774-50FC-482A-B066-EF4B3E16BBF5@cisco.com> <4F36B175.4060108@si6networks.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F36B175.4060108@si6networks.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <BC840AEE-39D9-4FBE-BC15-1ABEB4450625@puck.nether.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:47:23 -0500
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9B5141a)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (puck.nether.net [204.42.254.5]); Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:03:35 -0500 (EST)
Cc: v6ops v6ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-gont-v6ops-ra-guard-evasion
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:04:47 -0000

Support!

Jared Mauch

On Feb 11, 2012, at 1:20 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:

> FYI, strictly speaking, the latest revision of this is
> draft-gont-v6ops-ra-guard-implementation
> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-v6ops-ra-guard-implementation-01)
> -- this is the I-D that I'd expect the WG to decide whether to adopt
> (since it is the one that incoporporates all the comments received so far.
> 
> Thanks,
> Fernando
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 02/11/2012 04:00 AM, Fred Baker wrote:
>> The author has asked whether the working group supports this as a working group draft.
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Fernando Gont
> SI6 Networks
> e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
> PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email