[v6ops] Preliminary agenda posted

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 14 July 2011 17:54 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF9511E80BC for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.536
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.536 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.937, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id risWJGb8NvXG for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6682311E80BB for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; l=2608; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1310666069; x=1311875669; h=subject:mime-version:from:date:cc:reply-to:message-id:to: content-transfer-encoding; bh=LR0odOu/YQgMs9c8vCYgaJGMG9hJc0Cu85P/JvyRAqA=; b=ZVkYMgh4BwTLY/VdxD+WDD7kZDyuYMeDnz7YdqN0X4kHRQVkFHH+1HST OIYmvYosk05GpFKMcXRIWgNvX9zG//wYN/Vy7VajQfINESKQ3zrcyIgn9 vsrKJUGGzW1bcnKCEMF92H7T1mLUREzL8cDS8QDe/1CewFYkNH6jJbSk8 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAGUsH06rRDoH/2dsb2JhbABTp1d3rGqDFQ8Bmn2FW18EkmSFAItt
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,530,1304294400"; d="scan'208";a="3014547"
Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Jul 2011 17:54:28 +0000
Received: from Freds-Computer.local (sjc-vpn4-654.cisco.com [10.21.82.142]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p6EHsRDQ009990; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:54:27 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by Freds-Computer.local (PGP Universal service); Thu, 14 Jul 2011 13:54:28 -0400
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by Freds-Computer.local on Thu, 14 Jul 2011 13:54:28 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 13:54:17 -0400
Message-Id: <DEB03AC5-8AFB-43AF-811E-C2AAD8CAE0B3@cisco.com>
To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [v6ops] Preliminary agenda posted
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Ron Bonica <ron@bonica.org>, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:54:31 -0000

A first-cut agenda has been posted at
	http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/81/agenda/v6ops.html

I need to apologize to the people behind ten drafts. We currently have posted

	draft-matsushima-v6ops-transition-experience-02.txt
	draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming-04.txt
	draft-fling-v6ops-hybrid-bridged-routed-00.txt
	draft-andrews-v6ops-6to4-router-option-02.txt
	draft-chown-v6ops-call-to-arms-03.txt
	draft-gont-v6ops-ra-guard-evasion-01.txt
	draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-06.txt
	draft-yang-v6ops-space6-icp-00.txt
	draft-sarikaya-v6ops-prefix-delegation-07.txt
	draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-05.txt
	draft-gashinsky-v6nd-enhance-00.txt
	draft-templin-v6ops-isops-12.txt
	draft-gundavelli-v6ops-pmipv6-address-reservations-00.txt
	draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-bearer-network-trials-00.txt
	draft-elkins-6man-ipv6-diagnostic-header-00.txt
	draft-hilliard-v6ops-ipv6-discard-prefix-00.txt
	draft-kuarsingh-wireline-incremental-ipv6-00.txt
	draft-tan-v6ops-fast6-aaa-01.txt
	draft-deng-v6ops-aplusp-experiment-results-01.txt
	draft-jjmb-v6ops-comcast-ipv6-experiences-01.txt
	draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis-01.txt
	draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-cpe-02.txt
	draft-yang-v6ops-fast6-pppoe-01.txt
	draft-yang-v6ops-fast6-tools-selection-01.txt
	draft-li-v6ops-load-balancing-requirement-01.txt
	draft-ietf-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-03.txt
	draft-keranen-ipv6day-measurements-01.txt
	draft-sunq-v6ops-contents-transition-01.txt
	draft-dec-stateless-4v6-02.txt
	draft-chown-v6ops-address-accountability-01.txt

which is to say "30 drafts". We have 270 minutes, 150 on Tuesday and 120 on Thursday. In the agenda, I have given slots to 20 discussions, three of which are reports on IPv6 Day that don't have drafts behind them; that pretty much means 13 minutes each, including switchover time. The other thirteen drafts didn't make the cut.

"Making the cut", as we discussed in IETF-80, involves traction on the list or the chairs deciding it's important. Joel and I think the World IPv6 Day is timely and important, and solicited talks from various quarters. The other drafts on the agenda are drafts that have had discussion on the list, got high marks in the survey I ran in early June, or by some other argument seem operationally valuable. The ones that didn't make the cut had negative traction on the list or no list discussion at all, or is targeted to a different working group such as opsawg.

If someone thinks we have misjudged something, please comment to the chairs. We'll finalize the agenda next week.