[v6ops] [Errata Verified] RFC6555 (4728)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 29 March 2017 17:21 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86421129485; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QGdclvt1s8xu; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:21:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23E81128C84; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:21:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 7A52BB8015A; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:21:14 -0700 (PDT)
To: stefan.winter@restena.lu, dwing-ietf@fuggles.com, ayourtch@cisco.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: joelja@bogus.com, iesg@ietf.org, v6ops@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20170329172114.7A52BB8015A@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:21:14 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/aV_xW6t8Ga151CAo79H1crvxL34>
Subject: [v6ops] [Errata Verified] RFC6555 (4728)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:21:29 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC6555, "Happy Eyeballs: Success with Dual-Stack Hosts". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6555&eid=4728 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu> Date Reported: 2016-07-05 Verified by: Joel Jaeggli (IESG) Section: 1 Original Text ------------- However, this does not scale well (to the number of DNS servers worldwide or the number of content providers worldwide) and does react to intermittent network path outages. Corrected Text -------------- However, this does not scale well (to the number of DNS servers worldwide or the number of content providers worldwide) and does not react to intermittent network path outages. Notes ----- The introduction makes a case against a whitelist of DNS servers because it does not scale well and is not flexible. DNS server whitelists indeed to not react to intermittent network outages, so the only logical sentence to form is to state that they do not. The "not" has been omitted, reversing the logical meaning of the sentence. -------------------------------------- RFC6555 (draft-ietf-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-07) -------------------------------------- Title : Happy Eyeballs: Success with Dual-Stack Hosts Publication Date : April 2012 Author(s) : D. Wing, A. Yourtchenko Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : IPv6 Operations Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [v6ops] [Errata Verified] RFC6555 (4728) RFC Errata System