Re: [v6ops] draft-smith-v6ops-local-only-addressing

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 03 December 2019 00:13 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7462C1200E0 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 16:13:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yhgffzcvAYCv for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 16:13:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x434.google.com (mail-pf1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::434]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 193D3120058 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 16:13:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x434.google.com with SMTP id y206so748393pfb.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 16:13:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sDSl8mQ/vio/aA0xhaVEBAWLLzKBsfBF7OyyeSOo3u0=; b=XoPc2vSVaMlgi4bwqQQpbAFYF9u8WdVS5bB6dX+iuhRFhnwPbIv+J6OrGVX4/AO83J bTG+GtB28MDvZ1R5IvDZs+vkAw5g1aC3UPd5SU5hBzy0fW4PhCWszK9+ZlnHxYd0x0YN HH5BgqwUrNBS2BVhYF1USq1Far3+owBnJf3aFkGTdfgAWgKKclL/XL9pISdQpcrLN6Cu 4bz2siSqvkzv9iuaYWQoMf6kmQaBC1/rbqw0UhbRQ0BU8oSZVcZWYP4gM+vZ5ZwkCcs4 cy/9UOBZTpMBa5AC6vlnR6K3cbCBsO4hw0D46EGsFuj5qu/85l4Sv6YvkoBdYtYdlx8F fGNQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sDSl8mQ/vio/aA0xhaVEBAWLLzKBsfBF7OyyeSOo3u0=; b=jofFsVF+eO43Pdrv4ATlXUH+6pb+8o/dl7szEBecoUUuXCtrGASyh6beqqLC76Wd0V 3pglWndBWG/FbGNe2bA6xzd2FW7C87xOnKDfWMsTImH8HR4VPQ+vrBG1xyhkfB3Ye1OW V67lnm8THkbq+LY6ORrILp4A7+DP0TxAxp+zL9OhH1Ab+L4sBYEsjEeP9kkfYCw+jFc2 Sy3bE3A6YG504QTAothvcphPQq7Fq0XpMebz0k+fhquHJsfgMVWY8fpdt7sj06lZRsJB pzo3T/NSK4HrX5SddWm0wZ3K9DOU/fEsIabsMyPG7szBmteEFhsWN6VlFN4T7xoAoQzE z8yQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVO7Z6cUcGBXrw03drS9q46Avid085t8W1VPX3iDJOuDgjGpCT+ ONKn9SRjTNlur2SmvYRmT4sAdWNc
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxgIsiuhfhCc9dORS80D1v9mEerO2YVG4m36POIclbnxjZh8Sc9XC7l4Be+XiyMgEsLw5eYMQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:be0e:: with SMTP id l14mr1527600pff.117.1575332020115; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 16:13:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [130.216.37.136] (sc-cs-567-laptop.uoa.auckland.ac.nz. [130.216.37.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h128sm646520pfe.172.2019.12.02.16.13.38 for <v6ops@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Dec 2019 16:13:39 -0800 (PST)
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <SN6PR05MB57109A5048345A6B2ECD6C5EAE410@SN6PR05MB5710.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <8237CDA6-DF99-43BB-8FFD-FC06179F5C75@employees.org> <6CF0CF5C-7E72-4E21-A476-3A5A65DBF7FA@gmail.com> <F2E9EB76-756C-41FF-9AC3-2E7B18DE1A3E@employees.org>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e3c0056d-a152-196d-a897-c93f87672d0f@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 13:13:35 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F2E9EB76-756C-41FF-9AC3-2E7B18DE1A3E@employees.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/agDUZTiYGK2Mlco90tsdD89y7c8>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-smith-v6ops-local-only-addressing
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 00:13:43 -0000

On 03-Dec-19 10:33, Ole Troan wrote:
> Hi Fred,
> 
>> I think you're thinking of an opec draft by Michael Behringer, https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7404. In essence, it suggests that routers only talk with each other and their local hosts using link-layer addressing in the "destination" address. 
>>
>> To my way of thinking, forcing that for all sessions means that one cannot access a device from a system that it is not directly connected to. Michael's proposal was in essence to prevent attacks on routers, permitting them to white-list network management devices and exclude pretty much everything else. Doing that for hosts would make the network pretty useless, I suspect. 
> 
> No it wasn't that one.

Well, there's always https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4864#section-3.2

And of course we punted on https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-considerations-02

   Brian

> It was very much along Mark's lines of increasing security by controlling reachability and scope of addressing to end hosts.
> Perhaps it was just something he talked about when Eric and he did advanced-security.
> 
> Regardless, seems like a fine idea. Devices that have no business being on the Internet, should as Mark proposes by default not have a global address.
> Now you might argue, are there really any such device.
> 
> Cheers,
> Ole
> 
>>
>>> On Dec 2, 2019, at 12:14 AM, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 30 Nov 2019, at 21:14, Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> draft-smith-v6ops-local-only-addressing
>>>
>>> I believe Townsley or was it Vyncke described a security model, where a device by default would only accept incoming connections on link-local or ULA addresses.
>>> The device would have a global address that could be used for outbound connections, e.g. software updated.
>>> Can't find or recall exactly where they described this model.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Ole
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> v6ops mailing list
>>> v6ops@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>