IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison-03: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Mon, 09 May 2022 00:16 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D216DC157B39; Sun, 8 May 2022 17:16:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yBdcQommZL-g; Sun, 8 May 2022 17:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2e.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 287F0C14F72B; Sun, 8 May 2022 17:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2e.google.com with SMTP id x8so12344051vsg.11; Sun, 08 May 2022 17:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=g/UEeYIQ2zGFqCIB8c8aGZxQ3ZrYprpe6WQKPN5Ba8o=; b=CVszPdk7HFUQ31BZXOZmktnIOJfVoHJRuVQ5M0ez+paN9ZSpECwEdnyv3RpcZuFqXx BJmkkSopJGfVQmgvRZyeRfqBm4Fw1PyBROo0LYW+vYBJWUVkpLF2M199p29MDrNIC9gV tMUjchUFgZ7havxB1B+nABITrf/G/zfJyBKiJ/GFT6uKSnoHLIsrSX0GqVZ9Qn1uxLlR 58E+z/K6J82rlIMmx3x3eE0xBGhRduge2KsC+gwEq09ksrTsc8WEKqbFr06NEQQFTK1N xw3eIZfH8gWEMsvULb+3dvCVeWni8fS2brxC5tvO5t/EJ6BeEGeWJeg4OfcLZlqZwOaB JZnA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=g/UEeYIQ2zGFqCIB8c8aGZxQ3ZrYprpe6WQKPN5Ba8o=; b=VFSc+KlkIT1UnH42Jm9Ur2Mikeyl8b0xefPkLuHzPrULp7IbvoOT3bBhhStVqDtHRT hRmlvCJL44yBwAsDOOj9gyxWaA5dauKgIXQ31I1vJWzE07dIXeNjZA9JVEXuj4IEesZG 3UyA4chtmz1+ncDvLkbU7r1XC3o8ZAFgMYHzgwUQkOE2B3i8oAQ9lnXcgZ/BbYG8Cn9F cZmCtGJ98lk7NZIVK04MNUuiSl+++FC2e6qpceuEA36gcjO4+o8hQNmJebrhzxMGlDF/ OEX+w3OqO0lMFajl6dUsnK/WTz4cM/N/uRL/4QS4GXl0agWyYzX3i0iU2krZJMS3VI5k oFqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532wJS8E78kqSKZEWElECvl8OVq9shEhs3WROFLMlhyjauP/t+QN M253nNBCD2AismFUJhLxNi0ELJdMtM1wCUaBDFk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxGrBNFFHC4mib+s69fWU9DjWRkOT648C0G+rBTC/aG5gbFL3vYnc4WGBKbsBpvqTtCfLKCRFOcfDUG9Qc26Bo=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:dd8a:0:b0:331:6a30:c60b with SMTP id i10-20020a67dd8a000000b003316a30c60bmr2835712vsk.83.1652055410637; Sun, 08 May 2022 17:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <165054930574.9400.16717401979063970306@ietfa.amsl.com> <e8c7b506-9b53-5601-1ddf-6980d73be7b0@hit.bme.hu>
In-Reply-To: <e8c7b506-9b53-5601-1ddf-6980d73be7b0@hit.bme.hu>
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 08 May 2022 17:16:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM4esxTqf3CW2==ruqRTW28vZdYXRxz5e+JA+ABBW-16Oc8G5A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gábor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison@ietf.org, v6ops-chairs@ietf.org, v6ops@ietf.org, rbonica@juniper.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e67def05de891ff7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/bRjsukxrPBVA6PthhlYi26yRKDI>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 00:16:54 -0000

maybe "...with the port numbers, [I-D.ietf.tsvwg-natsupp explain how NATs
can handle SCTP (Stream Control Transmission Protocol)."

Otherwise, looks good to me.

On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 5:16 AM Gábor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu> wrote:

> Dear Martin Duke,
>
> Thank you for your review and I am sorry for my slow response. Please see
> my reply (or rather question) inline.
>
> 4/21/2022 3:55 PM keltezéssel, Martin Duke via Datatracker írta:
>
> Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison-03: No Objection
>
>
> [...]
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks to Brian Trammell for the tsvart review.
>
> It would be nice to at least point to draft-ietf-tsvwg-natsupp-23 to discuss
> the issues with SCTP and NAT.
>
> I am glad to do so. However, I was not sure, which to section you
> recommend the pointer to be added.
>
> I have added the following paragraph to to the end of Section 3.2:
>
>    As stateful NAT interferes with the port numbers, please refer to
>    [I-D.ietf-tsvwg-natsupp] how SCTP (Stream Control Transmission
>    Protocol) NAT traversal can be handled.
>
> Did you think of something like that?
>
> Or could you propose a better text?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Gábor
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email