Re: [v6ops] draft-herbst-v6ops-cpeenhancements-00
Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Mon, 08 November 2010 00:18 UTC
Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB343A692C for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 16:18:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.338
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.338 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.261, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jc2N02MsY8NL for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 16:18:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com (sj-iport-5.cisco.com [171.68.10.87]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB423A6928 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 16:18:51 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-5.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.58,311,1286150400"; d="scan'208";a="282287478"
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.223.137]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Nov 2010 00:19:10 +0000
Received: from Freds-Computer.local (tky-vpn-client-230-234.cisco.com [10.70.230.234]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oA80J7Ob025336; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 00:19:10 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by Freds-Computer.local (PGP Universal service); Mon, 08 Nov 2010 08:19:10 +0900
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by Freds-Computer.local on Mon, 08 Nov 2010 08:19:10 +0900
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <AF742F21C1FCEE4DAB7F4842ABDC511C031E78B1@XMB-RCD-114.cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 08:18:59 +0800
Message-Id: <7C075DD5-CB1C-4110-95D4-95ABA7B2F2E0@cisco.com>
References: <AF742F21C1FCEE4DAB7F4842ABDC511C031E78B1@XMB-RCD-114.cisco.com>
To: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, d.sturek@att.net
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-herbst-v6ops-cpeenhancements-00
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 00:18:51 -0000
On Nov 8, 2010, at 8:16 AM, Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote: > Unless I see a picture for the routed topology of how the smart energy meter gateway is deployed in the home, it’s not clear what one should look into for integrating such a device in an existing home. I think Tom's point is that such topologies are under consideration in the Zigbee Alliance. That's their major reason for including IPv6 (6lowpan) in Smart Energy Profile 2.0, and an obvious secondary path to the utility for certain types of exchanges.
- [v6ops] draft-herbst-v6ops-cpeenhancements-00 Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] draft-herbst-v6ops-cpeenhancements-00 Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] draft-herbst-v6ops-cpeenhancements-00 Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] draft-herbst-v6ops-cpeenhancements-00 Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] draft-herbst-v6ops-cpeenhancements-00 Don Sturek
- Re: [v6ops] draft-herbst-v6ops-cpeenhancements-00 Fred Baker