[v6ops] v6ops Draft minutes Thursday March 29th 15:20

[Joel jaeggli <[e-mail]>]

v6ops ietf 83 session 2 commenced at 15:20

First presentation - IP Transitioning in CE Routers
draft-townsley-troan-ipv6-ce-transitioning
(old slides) http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/slides/slides-83-v6ops-4.pdf
(new slides)
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/slides/slides-83-v6ops-13.pptx

Second presentation - RFC 6204 bis
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/slides/slides-83-v6ops-11.pdf

	Ole T - DHCP fix going on in dhc WG


Fred B - regarding M/O bits read all discussion and take it up in 3315bis

	Francis D - w 6/7 remove them.

Question, ready for last call?

Answer - hum, (some in favor) (no opposed)

Question - no one prefers 6rd to native?

Answer - native prefered

Fred B - My perception is that we await an updated draft that deals with
the issues highlighted and we can run through a last call and be ready
to ship.

Third presentation - Implementation Advice for RA-Guard
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/slides/slides-83-v6ops-6.pdf

Question, ready for wglc?
Answer, hum (most in favor) (one opposed)

Fourth presentation -  Wireline: Incremental IPv6
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/slides/slides-83-v6ops-7.pptx

Fred B - going to have at least one more draft revision.

Question, hum for new version and after WGLC?
Answer, (favored) (no opposed).

Fifth presentation - SP Wi-Fi Services over Residential Architectures
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/slides/slides-83-v6ops-12.pptx

	Philip M - does this belong in other standards bodies such as
	wfa or 3gpp (or bbf)

Sixth Presentation - Using Only Link-Local Address In Network Core
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/slides/slides-83-v6ops-9.pptx

	Janos M - wording is rather strong, prefer informational to
	bcp us of LL address is a matter of taste.

	Jan H - seems brilliant when you design it less so afterwards.

	Iljisch B - occasions where this is useful.

	Janos M - bgp needs global v6 addresses.

	Francois D - agree with iljisch

meeting is concluded 1715