[v6ops] Inviting discussion: draft-sun-v6ops-xlat-multi

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 19 February 2015 20:37 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E32E1A01A8 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:37:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NiCewK-3mTkT for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:37:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E63B01A0095 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:37:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=188; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1424378250; x=1425587850; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=rInaMjLvv/rdJvoL6oRCgfBGXA86c+cworiB+xo/S2Y=; b=hcfKJmArICR7mbbetb18rr3D7658H4N8dHA2QAf2aCpTBVG84wHLtIt/ G4rLlDHUOGzGmfWCqxWmC9DS6aISAkReo5QxOOL4WEbdCfLDCa78yHfPr cic6bmrrLd1yZM7OPShfv8IpxeE2PfNSVBOy5zdmoB3KkEKpuO1aoFT/h Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AKBQANSeZU/4oNJK1bgwZSXsJqhXECgSNDAQEBAQEBfIQRAQQ6UQEqFEImAQQbiCcNrD2nawEBAQEBBQEBAQEBAQEXBI9Mg06BFAWPS4NcmQcig26CM38BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,610,1418083200"; d="scan'208";a="394449515"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2015 20:37:29 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com [173.37.183.76]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t1JKbTjf026485 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 20:37:29 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.149]) by xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([173.37.183.76]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:37:29 -0600
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Inviting discussion: draft-sun-v6ops-xlat-multi
Thread-Index: AdBMg+BUbLdN5ekmRoyPrUv+ZrmTfg==
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 20:37:28 +0000
Message-ID: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B0612B33C@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.116]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/cCMkA7e8qz33_ab9HPHxvZt5aMY>
Subject: [v6ops] Inviting discussion: draft-sun-v6ops-xlat-multi
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 20:37:31 -0000

I'd like to understand working group viewpoints, technical and operational, on https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sun-v6ops-xlat-multi-01. Does it belong on the agenda for IETF 92?