Re: [v6ops] draft-pref64folks-6man-ra-pref64

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Tue, 16 October 2018 11:12 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C79CC130DD7 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 04:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fZEtnCyNSlp4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 04:12:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DF33130DCC for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 04:12:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id E51EEB6; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 13:12:39 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1539688359; bh=YY+JYFMksMnhO6jaR1VC/VAD32rs4qhUUl59CQtGNcQ=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=qgCKJE+kxiMSc5U4qsmg4p1pAKDw5mVimB1V67wi5QeG3snMyOqYS/Ak8qYbXy/aa JVucJkx3K6Tf5ZnvJvIcmueratV9MIUu5G/T+SGpRXRuxDsXxvLw1RtoiEB2Otk+VA j7fTnbna+Zh7ap1Bcn5X6cerZ+pFrEy8KPkyBglw=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3026B2; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 13:12:39 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 13:12:39 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
cc: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAFU7BASLT9CLHzpxqeQUJDK0UTC+7CEyU70h+hZoKRx4LPJ1NA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1810161311560.17344@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <BYAPR05MB424561F343F1D9980BA8BADBAEFD0@BYAPR05MB4245.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1810160843040.17344@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAFU7BASLT9CLHzpxqeQUJDK0UTC+7CEyU70h+hZoKRx4LPJ1NA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/dlOf2NDxXmgCfFET3Uhck1bsesE>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-pref64folks-6man-ra-pref64
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:12:45 -0000

On Tue, 16 Oct 2018, Jen Linkova wrote:

> That text was added in response to a comment made in 6man@ re: multihomed hosts.
> You are right, there is nothing special about that option, it's just
> another PvD-specific configuration option.
> The reason to mention PvD is  be specific in describing corner cases.
> The multi-homing scenario, when a host might receive multiple Pref64,
> is one of such corner cases. IMHO it would be desirable to define the
> host behavior and limitations of the proposed solution.

Right. Well, since I do want PvDs to work I don't think it hurts to 
mention it in documents like this. Just as long as we make sure we don't 
define anything new regarding that in any other document unintentionally.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se