[v6ops] Working up an agenda for IETF Taipei
Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 25 October 2011 21:17 UTC
Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B0B1F0C5A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.336
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.336 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.263, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0lUEUvPb93nv for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-4.cisco.com (mtv-iport-4.cisco.com [173.36.130.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326561F0C57 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; l=1799; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1319577452; x=1320787052; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:message-id: references:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XUjJwYkF6UzTQeFjq3TGkKvna34WEqiShNn2hJxQSDQ=; b=ENoudvDkuHxla7JTgUweTW4J00p+Jl93jwIeoonUsA4L8lrP1g9FeR2x yn0CZ2vJX90aeX1l1idIU1z8ttxv7YyPoYso1I7O8wi19/5HFMMj5ENEa vBMiZRncxnD+S38VZ5TcrTJTIHgdt9dBG0ORkTPfIBlbWSQNQvSDIEpy8 Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAHMmp06rRDoH/2dsb2JhbABCqSOBBYFvAQEEDgQBJyskUVcGNZ1WAZ5mh3VhBIgGjASFLIxS
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,405,1315180800"; d="scan'208";a="10218722"
Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by mtv-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Oct 2011 21:17:32 +0000
Received: from Freds-Computer.local (sjc-vpn5-594.cisco.com [10.21.90.82]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9PLHVBr031590 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 21:17:31 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by Freds-Computer.local (PGP Universal service); Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:17:31 -0700
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by Freds-Computer.local on Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:17:31 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C74DCCE6-0E06-49B3-B069-F22DB71A9F85@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:17:17 -0700
Message-Id: <2DB53B4E-5C96-4692-AEC1-95165835C1B5@cisco.com>
References: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D7485279F7@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <C74DCCE6-0E06-49B3-B069-F22DB71A9F85@cisco.com>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [v6ops] Working up an agenda for IETF Taipei
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 21:17:32 -0000
We have a total of 22 current drafts at this instant, two of which don't have "v6ops" in their names. General comment to people doing drafts for v6ops: IETF tools and my small brain work better if the draft name is in the format draft-{author|ietf}-{wg}-text-nn.txt
4 are not subject to current discussion:
draft-ietf-v6ops-v4v6tran-framework-02.txt
draft-troan-v6ops-6to4-update-00.txt
draft-templin-v6ops-isops-14.txt
draft-kuarsingh-v6ops-6to4-provider-managed-tunnel-04.txt
2 have been sent to 6man as containing protocol changes:
draft-vanrein-v6ops-6bed4-00.txt
draft-asati-v6ops-dad-loopback-01.txt
6 are in the IESG's queues somewhere:
draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-multihoming-without-ipv6nat-01.txt
draft-gundavelli-v6ops-pmipv6-address-reservations-03.txt
draft-ietf-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-04.txt
draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-eps-08.txt
draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-discard-prefix-00.txt
draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-07.txt
5 are on my list to discuss
draft-kuarsingh-wireline-incremental-ipv6-02.txt
draft-jjmb-v6ops-comcast-ipv6-experiences-02.txt
draft-ietf-v6ops-v6nd-problems-00.txt
draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-01.txt
draft-hazeyama-widecamp-ipv6-only-experience-00.txt
5 are looking for working group support
draft-xli-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address-00.txt
draft-carpenter-v6ops-label-balance-00.txt
draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-00.txt
draft-liu-v6ops-ula-usage-analysis-00.txt
draft-jiang-v6ops-v4v6mc-proxy-00.txt
I am told to expect an update to draft-sunq-v6ops-contents-transition.
I have seen some comments from customers of CERNET looking for support of draft-xli-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address. Looking for other views. Inviting views on the other four new drafts and on updates posted this week.
- [v6ops] Working up an agenda for IETF Taipei Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Working up an agenda for IETF Taipei Sheng Jiang