Re: [v6ops] Need ref to 3GPP spec for the use of DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation, e.g. for smartphone tethering

Vízdal Aleš <ales.vizdal@t-mobile.cz> Tue, 08 October 2013 09:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ales.vizdal@t-mobile.cz>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A39021E819D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 02:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_CZ=0.445, HOST_EQ_CZ=0.904, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yXvIyRNdww5Z for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 02:00:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ctxmailhub.t-mobile.cz (ctxmailhub.t-mobile.cz [93.153.104.87]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 478FC21E8166 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 02:00:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from srvhk504.rdm.cz (unknown [10.254.92.81]) by ctxmailhub.t-mobile.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B5E52E09D3; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:00:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from SRVHKE02.rdm.cz ([fe80::94ce:8456:f6fa:86a8]) by srvhk504.rdm.cz ([::1]) with mapi; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:00:25 +0200
From: Vízdal Aleš <ales.vizdal@t-mobile.cz>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>, "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com>, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 11:00:23 +0200
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Need ref to 3GPP spec for the use of DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation, e.g. for smartphone tethering
Thread-Index: Ac7EBDQAkhn/wf8OQd+7dsT1jAnQuQAABhbQ
Message-ID: <1808340F7EC362469DDFFB112B37E2FCD87724542A@SRVHKE02.rdm.cz>
References: <B14A62A57AB87D45BB6DD7D9D2B78F0B2AB673CE@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com> <5252C5C2.5080706@gmail.com> <1808340F7EC362469DDFFB112B37E2FCD87724529F@SRVHKE02.rdm.cz> <5252DCEF.6030705@gmail.com> <1808340F7EC362469DDFFB112B37E2FCD87724530A@SRVHKE02.rdm.cz> <5252E66D.3080005@gmail.com> <1808340F7EC362469DDFFB112B37E2FCD87724531C@SRVHKE02.rdm.cz> <5253B80E.7030008@gmail.com> <1808340F7EC362469DDFFB112B37E2FCD877245410@SRVHKE02.rdm.cz> <5253C891.7090009@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5253C891.7090009@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Forwarded
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Need ref to 3GPP spec for the use of DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation, e.g. for smartphone tethering
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 09:00:31 -0000

> > If the tunnel drops, the PGW/GGSN will remove the route from their
> > routing table, once a new tunnel is setup the routing table is updated
> > accordingly.
> 
> The route associated with that tunnel should contain a parameter containing the
> Delegated Prefix.  When there is no delegated prefix, that route entry should be
> updated.
> 
> The tunnel could stay up but only for the Smartphone.  Or it could stay up for both the
> Smartphone _and_ the Hosts in the smartphone's LAN.
> These are two different things.

There is only one GTP tunnel and there is only one route as both the GGSN/PGW to UE
prefix (/64) and the delegated prefix route must be aggregateable. Check the specs ;-)
or take this one offline.

> Alex
> 
> 
> >
> >> Alex

Ales