IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] IPv6 addressing: Gaps? (draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-addressing-considerations)

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 18 February 2021 21:53 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 439E23A18E2 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 13:53:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0wy8BYY_hef8 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 13:53:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82d.google.com (mail-qt1-x82d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 584A23A18E5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 13:53:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82d.google.com with SMTP id e15so2566815qte.9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 13:53:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=G5zamrnY64HlSFz0JwI+q/Eqk1TjPgz55RWBVuttqAE=; b=R9UopCq9zBsrZ+ok9mlHxSse8oDPfhhTuuSNfTurc3VThyvXir2rExyjsdj+Q5Qk0m 68YGdm+gF+XOYxL6PQW0Lkm9nhC4p2yfhkWOu1z+ebT6Jf5+C4rnVdHFsEjueN7LYYGZ C3zKu7eDW/j4SZJkKzv1u9189JdUZsqrg0TcQX/+tVYe98+h2zCQVgUViDoEzuq84E3e TzYwjQggQx06hmfdId9vexqMngzZ1OCqKhfimkg0TFqZca80qlw0ggvmUsPbiuGf6Gmm C5yePCk63zogqsaZBuuRAATzHHTBj3LTq5PAH66FcixrEOplw2OBHcyXUO5iKwdEcX9G pqhg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=G5zamrnY64HlSFz0JwI+q/Eqk1TjPgz55RWBVuttqAE=; b=uC0zKYXKZ4AbqGvjm3gFrB6oWIzaaiG9aeIEXD2RYoW/73KFn4+ufulx+QUK7PXMEx ZxdnqnqSIH2CCp2SzIf3hIH2DCoj/wCP5MfO/p4xXKO5HilC/2/8XqpVWvSKs3MfMdyS kzm9NcZLp453NxbQDRMee2oi7f0iwYgp4W+FmhjdhqnCVYLqusN5HLCAgeAp18Vpdx0S TZeVHhaQcYgYXV/SddHKorhL3MeSTplgeE6ANBQ9AOb7nsdDwfh/NaCt3Hqg3r/dsvsA uut59BgVlxcaZopU/IEZrq5qcJHs9PEHGAoDg5L2OtDv30KdlVIWviv2JWDGKH7UvNyb 0nNw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530PabgltIxuDJGpcKch/EoMVke/xidDiJPO6mqahpUkIZdtrrW7 pTRsjgelJa6HLDASCjfFZdGL5EIUX/nFlQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyMsxPv05kg+v6q3dIJSAtg8mdFvY0+dnhmaTmL1i6nWQxIQX3DIAU1mZmGWS+4jRGO65w6Zw==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5447:: with SMTP id d7mr6274690qtq.56.1613685181219; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 13:53:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-24-91-177-160.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [24.91.177.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o1sm4140690qtq.81.2021.02.18.13.53.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Feb 2021 13:53:00 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <070854A8-AE3A-46F9-B894-E524A723B9CE@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_ABAE2A09-69AC-444C-B03D-E200C1B13BA2"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.32\))
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 16:53:00 -0500
In-Reply-To: <fbfd05eb-3a22-8e4d-4b82-44f70f6121b2@si6networks.com>
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
References: <36ba7456-210c-0626-5ec6-147538e49e5d@si6networks.com> <37012643-4F63-4FB6-979E-7C3BDD13DCD0@fugue.com> <fbfd05eb-3a22-8e4d-4b82-44f70f6121b2@si6networks.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.32)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/fDau1vTDcSROgKO8HrwDX5rcIzI>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv6 addressing: Gaps? (draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-addressing-considerations)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 21:53:04 -0000

On Feb 18, 2021, at 4:32 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:
> This text predates draft-gont-6man-ipv6-ula-scope which effectively does try to formally update the scope of ULAs.

I know you haven’t asked for a call for adoption yet, but it’s pretty clear that you’re in the rough on adding a “local” scope. I would hope that the working group would not adopt this document.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email