Re: [v6ops] draft-yu-v6ops-split6 question

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 24 March 2022 02:17 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E0D3A0D8B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 19:17:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MqKYIGod9IxL for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 19:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62d.google.com (mail-pl1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9338D3A0D79 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 19:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id p17so3328996plo.9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 19:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MFLAUxrTWBWR27GEr5YiB0ZXOClx0DDRfrzPgNfeVU0=; b=V8wKFBSHToGEsnB6bxfzVZF5zHqGLq72/fBaqTCUMpjrJruA5EPJuLQVlrvn0I9MV2 xQ2JR1GP7zTH+aC1UszklVFDEhjkt2NISuXVkcDnG83OBcvUitKiAfC2kcXngf5Lc96S 3IEUAiFGNzZZIrJnV56as27KxH7k1dR1ncj4XV/xYs09bbVutwXp7pjG68k4FSSJQbSK 6ALrqu4aty5GNbzqPWsutkgbnyb5jIcZhzulUzEMPIJXLgSp/busyz/X665UxQPtD2Fr 0BXfvdzfu56FNe3T+Dsn4WP50YKH8UXOC17LdbztgP8nsxLpKkBya+F8ml6Gg7DvY2eD O9QA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MFLAUxrTWBWR27GEr5YiB0ZXOClx0DDRfrzPgNfeVU0=; b=aAhsIV15wLsgCgBW4qbqzJS03TgKTRvQvHxs7PVpueoVECLSezC7eiWuv9RUZIJCE2 v7tlPT3LPBIa0UVFeDHsXm7ESRdFHjI4Euq+wvCESQIVNKUCh1hlqeVjMREseEyjH5W7 yr3HL40pGS+1g4+134m0Jz9FzETsrQpVUc/n4+2njkErrudjHCDryRby/GEZ+3ZzBb9E USH9qXdvAEgWLb2CobMmV3hyc1J5xp4pCMphLWxVjLeBY16YFBSDg55Mr3t/AjdApYA4 zgjGNAFXzQhbF588woByJLc9q9CyL9YyBwYwz5IhgkXcC0uVX6eaph19drc45UPFtNGh xIdg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530BH/Cl5JOFDFA85as9ZXpdDAuNTrtj18tIdBVCWoH8wXh3sFI0 CFMi091nWE6eoCHr7g9iVrY8swEXzVWlWA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJztpxoWucz1QheEDndR5NK9VpPI+vhAHP9y4SD0PtYYgRZ6j+1r/L0UNdKzjO6p3CEVuJchbg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3a92:b0:1c6:64a5:a403 with SMTP id om18-20020a17090b3a9200b001c664a5a403mr15449354pjb.89.1648088255483; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 19:17:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:1005:b501:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:1005:b501:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k4-20020a17090a910400b001bd171c7fd4sm7179984pjo.25.2022.03.23.19.17.33 for <v6ops@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Mar 2022 19:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <164782815040.16661.10557347152889564572@ietfa.amsl.com> <AAEC2F11-3BD7-41B9-A384-B47854613591@gmail.com> <0768760E-B28B-4C11-A5E9-1476B4425DEA@employees.org> <D7335352-3A25-4E70-9DE9-23967EAC7E31@cfiec.net> <YjhECZfPCdempLxQ@Space.Net>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <b3774890-f4ab-0e4e-55a4-cde810baa769@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 15:17:30 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <YjhECZfPCdempLxQ@Space.Net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/gOtpfnkuqDk7QQRimHHWEdJ5PpE>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-yu-v6ops-split6 question
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 02:17:42 -0000

We've had this discussion before, I thought.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6 makes the opposite argument. It wasn't strictly speaking necessary to make the argument at all, because BCP 198 (RFC 7608) settled the question.

    Brian
On 21-Mar-22 22:23, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 04:42:55PM +0800, hsyu wrote:
>>          </span></div><div><span><br></span></div><div><span>I think with the development of IPv6, the location and separation of IPv6 addresses is an issue worth discussing, such as:<br>By separating location and identity, a robust routing table can be achieved, reducing the risk of route explosion.<br>Let the routing address work in the routing space, and let the identity domain work in the identity space. Ensure easier routing and easier and more accurate authentication.</span></div>
> 
> While this sounds really nice, I have a hard time understanding how
> this would be achieved.
> 
> Mandate aggregation of routes?  To what level?
> 
> Disallow IPv6 PI space?
> 
> How would DNS look like, how would "small enterprise" multihoming look like?
> 
> Gert Doering
>          -- NetMaster
>