Re: [v6ops] Fwd: IETF 98 v6ops agenda request
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Wed, 08 March 2017 20:29 UTC
Return-Path: <prvs=1240a15ed2=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86F031295D2 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 12:29:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=jordi.palet@consulintel.es header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vfh_a0_NoHrI for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 12:29:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [217.126.185.215]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 779BC129420 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 12:29:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1489004937; x=1489609737; q=dns/txt; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic: References:In-Reply-To:Mime-version:Content-type: Content-transfer-encoding:Reply-To; bh=lZ0XKlcm6fkIHvmT7Mii3ol/t DFwRZrB+lzx8xg7v9Q=; b=NZTNVpsyiXH/PV++p5QNEj5Y9PxnQ+jr035RZA61q QOZd8v79gDsEOdE9e8UgGmVfhwN2MMNLP0kWll4ZYS4Y+FcpKkyFCAz7AkvkRom0 Rs8D2JTLDyQIuHcuwlUOPNNRWGqewC4mQwwOGbx5+u6/1aafi2B64rdbKHu1CJ+L i0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=MDaemon; d=consulintel.es; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=Lxn2N6KotnoCAyDy9dTqAxxRX6TCS3qzfo1T7BPq+alVy5g0irxkya30Bzuq lKqA3U2fPJMbNgeFZDhqHrz2I2EnAOoi+jNsSo91xtMWwTssk9G32Gts9 Iy30QSx00ifTDgl3BtLm05OJKYhIe9f/+8ZzhJCNa8JvORnm+9yWw8=;
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Wed, 08 Mar 2017 21:28:57 +0100
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Wed, 08 Mar 2017 21:28:52 +0100
Received: from [10.10.10.99] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v11.0.3) with ESMTP id md50005380747.msg for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 21:28:51 +0100
X-MDOP-RefID: re=0.000,fgs=0 (_st=1 _vt=0 _iwf=0)
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-HashCash: 1:20:170308:md50005380747::9qJyWpAdD+Apr/dO:0000Kmni
X-Return-Path: prvs=1240a15ed2=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: v6ops@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1f.0.170216
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 21:28:49 +0100
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <241F735D-EA14-4294-9435-2A74CDB68419@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Fwd: IETF 98 v6ops agenda request
References: <AC4979AA-EF37-4747-8AC8-CE133065BBEA@apple.com> <4AAC6FDE-9307-46A0-A380-759075FD2D3D@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4AAC6FDE-9307-46A0-A380-759075FD2D3D@gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/gbqKf0qB6HNAAs_-oGEQGrtMPr4>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Fwd: IETF 98 v6ops agenda request
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 20:29:06 -0000
I think we should. Actually, I wondered several times if we should start working on “retiring” HE. Reason for that. Is hiding IPv6 network problems. Many times, operators don’t realize that something failed with IPv6 because it falls back to IPv4. If IPv4 fails, we don’t have such mechanism, right? I fully understand the reason why HE was developed, but the situation is not the same, and the only way for operators and data centers to realize it now, is to force a customer complain. Maybe updating the document and explicitly saying that HE is updated with this document AND will be deprecated, let’s say at the end of 2017, could be a nice deal. Regards, Jordi -----Mensaje original----- De: v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Responder a: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Fecha: miércoles, 8 de marzo de 2017, 20:20 Para: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org> Asunto: [v6ops] Fwd: IETF 98 v6ops agenda request The chairs have received this request, and (surprise) are in the process of planning our agenda. Do folks want to discuss it? Begin forwarded message: From: David Schinazi <dschinazi@apple.com> Subject: IETF 98 v6ops agenda request Date: March 8, 2017 at 10:50:53 AM PST To: fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com, lee@asgard.org, Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Cc: v6ops-chairs@ietf.org, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> Hi v6ops chairs, Tommy Pauly and myself have written up what we've learned in the past few years maintaining and improving Apple's Happy Eyeballs stack, and submitted it as draft-pauly-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-update. We'd like the opportunity to present this at the v6ops session in Chicago. I think this would be a 15 minute presentation (including questions), with the title "An Update to Happy Eyeballs". Would that be possible? Full draft available here: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pauly-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-update <https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-pauly-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-update-00.txt> Thanks! David Schinazi _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.consulintel.es The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
- [v6ops] Fwd: IETF 98 v6ops agenda request Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: IETF 98 v6ops agenda request JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] IETF 98 v6ops agenda request Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] IETF 98 v6ops agenda request Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: IETF 98 v6ops agenda request STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [v6ops] IETF 98 v6ops agenda request STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [v6ops] IETF 98 v6ops agenda request Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: IETF 98 v6ops agenda request Enno Rey
- Re: [v6ops] IETF 98 v6ops agenda request Gert Doering