IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] RFC6555 / Multiple interfaces

"Asveren, Tolga" <tasveren@sonusnet.com> Mon, 02 January 2017 19:42 UTC

Return-Path: <tasveren@sonusnet.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3035C129467 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 11:42:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=sonusnetworks.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Ds6yrGgUEBO for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 11:42:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-211.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-211.mimecast.com [63.128.21.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D95D129637 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 11:42:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=SonusNetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-sonusnet-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=3HQSFSgeQE8cV9iK5Gk3R/NTKqq9UkYJ+kcgs7C9/sU=; b=IIKlMge5WdvLGIYoIVl6Or/iDOjleaCRqnr/5hGHAJ7yAlgfWx2eOsjqKmuavKPy0eR9qn40Y5kTJOj1T050j1uz1r9CHocmG+oLB5eoDOejkwHwheZmR4nN1X1Yknt08aJ1h//tvsAXRxDK64fBbdd6OZFra3DY/4XFDUXZTlQ=
Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam01lp0175.outbound.protection.outlook.com [216.32.181.175]) (Using TLS) by us-smtp-1.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-140-3-PdmWs0NFaZ5OhglINB3g-1; Mon, 02 Jan 2017 14:41:56 -0500
Received: from SN2PR03MB2350.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.166.210.141) by SN2PR03MB2351.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.166.210.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.803.11; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 19:41:52 +0000
Received: from SN2PR03MB2350.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.210.141]) by SN2PR03MB2350.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.210.141]) with mapi id 15.01.0803.021; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 19:41:52 +0000
From: "Asveren, Tolga" <tasveren@sonusnet.com>
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] RFC6555 / Multiple interfaces
Thread-Index: AdJd8SFBepmXKJ7HSuuR2VCwtJY5xwB2CikAABQvbXAAANEQgAAWRS+AAQgXVC4AJijfEA==
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2017 19:41:51 +0000
Message-ID: <SN2PR03MB23507DE3BE34A6770387DE2EB26F0@SN2PR03MB2350.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <SN2PR03MB23500102CF7EDAD42630881FB2940@SN2PR03MB2350.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <C37C2227-7B42-4246-8F61-C0D1DE411B98@gmail.com> <SN2PR03MB235015A5229B7E10A265EA89B2690@SN2PR03MB2350.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAO42Z2wy0KORhUbXC+7EZphemigi2wd4YWDJ-JBjOXEbiejVYw@mail.gmail.com> <6cc8fa42-cb66-816b-f000-3635cde9cc90@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1612310559380.1747@uplift.swm.pp.se> <651319E6-BF0B-4700-B875-EA77440EB2C4@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <651319E6-BF0B-4700-B875-EA77440EB2C4@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [73.29.18.75]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 08f7d9b9-6312-42bd-4a1a-08d43347667d
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(22001);SRVR:SN2PR03MB2351;
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SN2PR03MB2351; 7:KzrMuoAQ90BwxnrCgl+7ZkquSPOkbz8IpSzeH1uW0991VdXSAxJn4cG9n2Ibn8rvZby82QrcOKLjOL2UkFtNyUdB+VMJCvI8QzGiu+btHlz/S9KmyRJQTmpAkKhpmQBLTSvIEHs+WJttH31AwCYjbkCfbeXdZmNoePw2P0vM+TDZizTegEpc0kLv4MNrvMD4lsIzPhtlZ/EuNEtjef9xlWdc7wY32ogitEw9/t4Lw0VdfADi+onRMJaeoVITSISsbHEOj/h6cFuf3idSWmC8WshEW0oexYr4cE+U/YuS03VErYOcYVAOI7LYvfohQ+2+INCeltclcd7qeqwDk2XF5Fx/sLqAr9lyZQix1Ujb9lkDs0mTYsLEByZMw1X1ovJdCt4sYHi2VcTSmfHI183hb0mKFW3Wjdt25v098O2tfivOU9ePzBX6kgUkVdUsaK3L66IBOD0TLkd4qzIj6D4m4A==
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SN2PR03MB2351DB7416837B8402B9CE59B26F0@SN2PR03MB2351.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6041248)(20161123564025)(20161123562025)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(6072148)(6047074); SRVR:SN2PR03MB2351; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SN2PR03MB2351;
x-forefront-prvs: 017589626D
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(7916002)(39450400003)(13464003)(24454002)(189002)(199003)(377454003)(106356001)(77096006)(7696004)(74316002)(86362001)(5660300001)(38730400001)(7736002)(6436002)(81166006)(25786008)(2906002)(2900100001)(122556002)(4326007)(6506006)(3660700001)(229853002)(8936002)(33656002)(9686002)(2950100002)(3280700002)(99286003)(50986999)(66066001)(189998001)(81156014)(5001770100001)(305945005)(92566002)(8676002)(39060400001)(55016002)(3846002)(102836003)(76176999)(68736007)(97736004)(6116002)(93886004)(101416001)(54356999)(105586002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:SN2PR03MB2351; H:SN2PR03MB2350.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: sonusnet.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 02 Jan 2017 19:41:52.0013 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 29a671dc-ed7e-4a54-b1e5-8da1eb495dc3
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN2PR03MB2351
X-MC-Unique: 3-PdmWs0NFaZ5OhglINB3g-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="WINDOWS-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/iRVpMkJvM65lSe0Z_LqIF6jU1kQ>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] RFC6555 / Multiple interfaces
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2017 19:42:04 -0000

I would like to (re)express my interest in defining how happy-eyeballs (RFC6555) should behave in the context of multiple interfaces. I think draft-ietf-mif-happy-eyeballs-extension-11 could be a good candidate for that but I also have to admit I was hoping for something with less procedures/simpler -which may/may not be possible/a good idea at the end-.

Thanks,
Tolga

> -----Original Message-----
> From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker
> Sent: Sunday, January 01, 2017 8:23 PM
> To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
> Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [v6ops] RFC6555 / Multiple interfaces
> 
> 
> On Dec 30, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
> wrote:
> > This of course makes me a sad panda. It was done because of lack of
> interest, but if people are interested in working in this area then if we can
> gather enough people that show interest, AD might change his mind.
> 
> IMHO, MIF is readily solved, and is in fact solved in deployment in a number
> of implementations. You put the software or hardware equivalent of an L2
> switch between the connected interfaces, so that to IP they are in fact one
> interface, and a packet received on one is switched to the another if and only
> if it is appropriate.
> 
> Solved, and anything that is more complex probably has bugs to be worked
> out.
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email