Re: [v6ops] Some questions on draft-zhang-v6ops-ipv6oa-iwf

<sunjp@sttri.com.cn> Tue, 03 July 2012 04:56 UTC

HMM_SOURCE_IP: 10.27.101.10:40199.111449767
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP
Received: from sunTHINK (unknown [10.27.101.10]) by corp.21cn.com (HERMES) with ESMTP id A195045C02D; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 12:56:57 +0800 (CST)
Received: from sunTHINK ([218.80.215.132]) by 21CN-entas10(MEDUSA 10.27.101.10) with ESMTP id 1341291417.25378 for fred@cisco.com ; Tue Jul 3 12:57:04 2012
0/X-Total-Score: 0:
2/X-Total-Score: 0:
X-FILTER-SCORE: to=<8793868561848a9484904f84908e758a8f824f759490964f7b9096958a8f886189968298868a4f84908e9757909194618a8695874f9093889b89828f88808b9961949595938a4f84908e4f848f>, score=<1341291424BxBBiB7xiT2LRbtBBBBB7BjMjjpjHMpcWQAZGjjjjjHj>
From: sunjp@sttri.com.cn
To: fred@cisco.com
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 12:56:59 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
Thread-Index: AQHNWCteNCRYj+zU4EuHibb6lobgm5cW0CcggAALGuCAACM+gA==
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609
Message-Id: <20120703045657.A195045C02D@corp.21cn.com>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 16:48:10 -0700
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org, '张届新' <zhang_jx@sttri.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Some questions on draft-zhang-v6ops-ipv6oa-iwf
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 05:23:13 -0000

 
intent for draft-zhang-v6ops-ipv6oa-iwf :
> 
> 
> 1) Please provide a succinct problem statement for your draft. What 
> problem/issue is this draft discussing? What operational problems does 
> the proposal address in real life networks?
> A: Currently, IPoA encapsulation is migrated to an Ethernet 
> aggregation network in [TR101]. This draft proposes a solution to 
> provide a smooth communication between legacy ATM/SDH and IPv6 over 
> Ethernet when network migrates to IPv6.
> 
> 2) Where does this draft or presentation fits into v6ops' current 
> charter (http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/v6ops/charter/)? Citing 
> specific a
> section(s) of the charter is preferable.
> A: In v6ops charter, the first goal is " Solicit input from network 
> operators and users to identify operational issues with the IPv4/IPv6 
> Internet, and determine solutions or workarounds to those issues. " 
> This draft fits into this one.
> 
> 3) Who is this draft's audience?
> A: Those operators whose networks contain both ATM/SDH and IPv6 over 
> Ethernet, such as China Telecom, Vodafone, etc.
> 
> 4) Have any operators expressed interest in this draft or its problem 
> space, either via review or other discussion?
> A: China Telecom expressed great interests. As far as we know, 
> Vodafone might also interest.
> 
> 5) Is this draft pursuing discussion in any other WGs? If so, please 
> list them here, along with rationale for the interaction with multiple 
> WGs in parallel.
> A: We firstly pursue discussion in v6ops. If there is any other WG you 
> think related to this work, we can also try.
> 
> 6) Is any protocol work being recommended in the draft?
> A: No. This draft only focus on interworking function.
> 
> 

> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fred@cisco.com [mailto:fred@cisco.com]
> Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2012 8:45 PM
> To: draft-zhang-v6ops-ipv6oa-iwf@tools.ietf.org
> Cc: v6ops-chairs@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Some questions on draft-zhang-v6ops-ipv6oa-iwf
> 
> Let me ask some questions. This is not intended to put you off or 
> offend, but to help the chairs in understanding where the draft fits 
> in the big scheme of things.
> 
> 1) Please provide a succinct problem statement for your draft. What 
> problem/issue is this draft discussing? What operational problems does 
> the proposal address in real life networks?
> 
> 2) Where does this draft or presentation fits into v6ops' current 
> charter (http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/v6ops/charter/)? Citing 
> specific a
> section(s) of the charter is preferable.
> 
> 3) Who is this draft's audience?
> 
> 4) Have any operators expressed interest in this draft or its problem 
> space, either via review or other discussion?
> 
> 5) Is this draft pursuing discussion in any other WGs? If so, please 
> list them here, along with rationale for the interaction with multiple 
> WGs in parallel.
> 
> 6) Is any protocol work being recommended in the draft?
> 
> the criteria the WG asked me to apply for new work or presentation 
> slots
> are:
>   - recent or recently updated draft
>   - within charter
>   - results in constructive discussion on the mailing list
> 
> I need for you to provoke discussion on the list. You may respond to 
> my opening email to do so if it's helpful.

Re: [v6ops] Some questions on draft-zhang-v6ops-i… sunjp