IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] comments on draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world-00

神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Tue, 12 August 2014 18:46 UTC

Return-Path: <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 349451A06B6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 11:46:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_42=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 33puaxXmxobz for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 11:46:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x22b.google.com (mail-we0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF14D1A06DA for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 11:46:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id p10so10513933wes.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 11:46:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=sQitW0+Kz7dSu8vtNN/L+imldVqZ5srBbmjD47Jbe9w=; b=aOuBZ+WAisDMfgYgqSf5ukGYuV82NRCajiCDAO9RLBYTjQUgORZ2MZqemdIktSdmTZ 07PtFidMSL4EJqHo9XP4B2Hep+nbVRFCWD0rzpewr18LfTroZSWuV8rrsCNll/JLx40u w0dTMrHWycpv88OlckBp6MXWqO9CqsmNTHlZ52A6UYuWR4swVh4jeNqmS5yRVVAVwlOA z8KiSHsfkEkN6dYjs2yuXNi4W7cSOH6tnmXGtM/S6tm3ah8enN1HmBMKo7izW4qPncev JqhoYNOa+mBDsfqsGMgO1TIoCCfsPRDkmJLOIbtLTakW80DFZC1K0a24r1BgcgTTPhyQ 7mFw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.86.1 with SMTP id l1mr471526wiz.62.1407869215247; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 11:46:55 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.123.164 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 11:46:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53E90FBA.8030701@si6networks.com>
References: <CAJE_bqf_u3+hz1mGnH7JvyNVi4HRpVu7mD4GN86vKwmUm_iWug@mail.gmail.com> <53E5382E.3010302@si6networks.com> <CAJE_bqcyjSLbcRWM_sJcQN1upQNc2+NXO6_7PnV03bTzZOOGJw@mail.gmail.com> <53E90FBA.8030701@si6networks.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 11:46:55 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: wqY22RIyqWifP7NAeNEYpu0UoDI
Message-ID: <CAJE_bqez7endxSngD=-8kM-JKocSSzeD5LLuGGq8V6peDMqqNQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/idE4cmFYQx69Bxp6ABYLbtXVisY
Cc: draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world@tools.ietf.org, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] comments on draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world-00
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 18:46:58 -0000

At Mon, 11 Aug 2014 14:47:22 -0400,
Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:

> > One easy improvement that would have worked for me is to add more
> > description to the tables, e.g. "Table 1: WIPv6LD dataset: Packet drop
> > rate for different destination types (upper) and estimated percentage
> > of dropped packets that were deemed to be dropped in a different AS
> > (lower, in parentheses)".
>
> Ok. Do you think it might help clarify things if we "split" each table
> into two tables: one with the drop rate, and another with the "rate of
> packet drops by different AS"?

Maybe.  But I think the most important point is to clearly describe
the meaning of these range numbers *in some way*.  Separating tables
seems to be a minor detail to me in that sense.

--
JINMEI, Tatuya

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email