[v6ops] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7934 (4806)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 29 March 2017 14:46 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86FF8127449; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 07:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BhGXwB7iKCu9; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 07:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83F26126DD9; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 07:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id D043FB8163B; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 07:46:10 -0700 (PDT)
To: markzzzsmith@gmail.com, lorenzo@google.com, vint@google.com, cheshire@apple.com, dschinazi@apple.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: joelja@bogus.com, iesg@ietf.org, v6ops@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20170329144610.D043FB8163B@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 07:46:10 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/j3Z7U0rG_Svywv4fjUFszF3D_LM>
Subject: [v6ops] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7934 (4806)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:46:23 -0000
The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC7934, "Host Address Availability Recommendations". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7934&eid=4806 -------------------------------------- Status: Held for Document Update Type: Technical Reported by: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> Date Reported: 2016-09-20 Held by: Joel Jaeggli (IESG) Section: 3 Original Text ------------- 3. Benefits of Providing Multiple Addresses Today, there are many host functions that require more than one IP address to be available to the host, including: o Privacy addressing to prevent tracking by off-network hosts [RFC4941]. ... Corrected Text -------------- 3. Benefits of Providing Multiple Addresses Today, there are many host functions that require more than one IP address to be available to the host, including: o Privacy addressing to prevent tracking by off-network hosts [RFC4941]. ... o Other potential use cases such as those described in [RFC1681]. Notes ----- Somewhat trivial errata, a reference to RFC1681, " On Many Addresses per Host", would be good to credit Steve's early thoughts, and those which probably in part lead to [TARP]. No urgency to update, a note to include it if this RFC is ever updated. -------------------------------------- RFC7934 (draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability-07) -------------------------------------- Title : Host Address Availability Recommendations Publication Date : July 2016 Author(s) : L. Colitti, V. Cerf, S. Cheshire, D. Schinazi Category : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE Source : IPv6 Operations Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [v6ops] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7934… RFC Errata System