[v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Mon, 26 January 2015 05:03 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F0DF1A1BF2 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 21:03:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uE1q8KEhwhCl for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 21:03:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8A831A1BF1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 21:03:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1373; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1422248612; x=1423458212; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=b5a+DDNbqqzv3uZYquA88wM+nkMY/+tqxF1rhKBjsnM=; b=KjwLEZFPo/H/3jghVKRv+xRF8w2I0vioNZisUnl8l3AQsABJtg1mnxw0 ZTXoopN9X8VnXnsjJVmuKqhTX0BKqsKNWwL4xJSDY06BeImkubmL+CSkv gRbkkoYxZrjHsQCbrteEqgpj7HTG4OAFDniOcf+wfYD6b7FhRT7UgDSEf s=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 487
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApQFAMTJxVStJA2L/2dsb2JhbABagwaBL4J8yj9DAQEBAQF9hBMjaAFKAjQnBCGIHq4+j0iUFgEBAQEBBQEBAQEBAQEBGpJnLoETBY5ugVOBKYYlkjwig26CM34BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,466,1418083200"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="117482403"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Jan 2015 05:03:31 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com [173.36.12.83]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0Q53TvT024317 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 05:03:29 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.211]) by xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com ([173.36.12.83]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 23:03:29 -0600
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat
Thread-Index: AQHQOSVstdgEFfvlQUi6KZXbkDo3Eg==
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 05:03:28 +0000
Message-ID: <EADB7950-D066-4727-869E-3A6E984AAB13@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.121]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_62DF3C92-F8D4-4FAE-87B4-676380E52565"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/j9-mYc2kjEkytDfjGyP75nvaqWQ>
Subject: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 05:03:33 -0000

We agreed to take draft-anderson-v6ops-siit-dc as a working group draft; it is now posted as draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc. I’m not clear on draft-anderson-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat; Tore has done the work to post it as draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat, but I don’t know the collected opinion. Do we want it (and do we want draft-anderson-v6ops-siit-dc-eam) as working group drafts?