IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] FW: New Version Notification for draft-palet-v6ops-464xlat-deployment-00.txt

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Mon, 09 October 2017 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5314E134E7F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 08:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d5LtoSHI_AWR for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 08:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 675671345B7 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 08:16:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id C9C85B2; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 17:16:53 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1507562213; bh=wl6jJZMjYU0pjt6ngl4mrOyrVYnZGRbd/SzGwzWXR0U=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UrSGc+QT5KkVbrk6nG5ncpStu0ylO1yDww/jZh8Lreecy5zrxPjRRe0KZ5ofqg+Ar 4VEjdallvQySl1NqNog0fSWUg7y1tXnmyqUfxvqc5nkf1X0vQIzdLCb4VMBY3NJnz6 sBmvWGAHKKihA8ZRJqOK1DqIYraeCZ6RxN4lfTZQ=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6051B0; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 17:16:53 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 17:16:53 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
cc: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>, IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGQJXFOEysWbDRM3JZwy2JKquxzpTTDy5_XbOm7-Db7xjg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1710091711380.31961@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <150755581666.18336.7914755965262691836.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CB970DA1-7E14-4E38-8FE1-535108518819@consulintel.es> <CAD6AjGQJXFOEysWbDRM3JZwy2JKquxzpTTDy5_XbOm7-Db7xjg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/kdt7BD1cz43j-BK80QOO1QFqk2s>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] FW: New Version Notification for draft-palet-v6ops-464xlat-deployment-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 15:24:27 -0000

On Mon, 9 Oct 2017, Ca By wrote:

> For a BCP, it may be best reflected that the *common* practice of 
> operators is to pay no mind to DNSSEC.

Comcast does DNSSEC validation from what I have understood. Google DNS 
(8.8.8.8) does the same.

80% of Internet users in Sweden sit behind a DNSSEC validating resolver.

Unfortunately at this point in time https://stats.labs.apnic.net/dnssec/US 
is not working so I can't give you numbers. DNSSEC has a non-trivial 
deployment base and needs to be taken into account. I wouldn't use that 
argument to stop DNS64 though.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email