[v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem WGLC

fred@cisco.com Sun, 31 May 2015 18:00 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4FC1A877B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 May 2015 11:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.511
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0P_teTYCvKwv for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 May 2015 11:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com []) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F2C61A876D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 May 2015 11:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=632; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1433095204; x=1434304804; h=date:from:message-id:to:subject:cc; bh=seFf8QR6WMbJAfhVcgTuKclBPrYWLKCQxni+fo28YJw=; b=LAXt8fhV+Ve7klzPbcVWqD1ZwtYt98pQZs5cxS36+p2JSivhtoWHCIcI IMSKZ9HkyGQhtg0dSmGeazGrotcoNvUVXsOVMz7VM+voqbh6MtIt++9JG 3K9yQ5cI0fNa3J10cyw2Wz/rBgWRTu6CisNRBd4b0to0nYDgPyUT2CjPo E=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,527,1427760000"; d="scan'208";a="3318173"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 31 May 2015 18:00:03 +0000
Received: from irp-lnx1.cisco.com (irp-lnx1.cisco.com []) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4VI03An025830 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 31 May 2015 18:00:03 GMT
Received: from irp-lnx1.cisco.com (localhost.localdomain []) by irp-lnx1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t4VI02WX026431; Sun, 31 May 2015 11:00:02 -0700
Received: (from fred@localhost) by irp-lnx1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id t4VI02Cf026378; Sun, 31 May 2015 11:00:02 -0700
Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 11:00:02 -0700
From: fred@cisco.com
Message-Id: <201505311800.t4VI02Cf026378@irp-lnx1.cisco.com>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/kiyYUCuHIlXA5ZvWsitBuNvbXVI>
Subject: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 18:00:05 -0000

This is to initiate a two week working group last call of
Please read it now. If you find nits (spelling errors, minor suggested
wording changes, etc), comment to the authors; if you find greater
issues, such as disagreeing with a statement or finding additional
issues that need to be addressed, please post your comments to the

We are looking specifically for comments on the importance of the
document as well as its content. If you have read the document and
believe it to be of operational utility, that is also an important
comment to make.