[v6ops] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd-07
Kyle Rose via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 28 April 2025 04:20 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Delivered-To: v6ops@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from [10.244.8.147] (unknown [104.131.183.230]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D7821DBCD8; Sun, 27 Apr 2025 21:20:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Rose via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.39.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <174581400144.421376.14795738647644801686@dt-datatracker-7bd7b9d5d5-79vfh>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 21:20:01 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: KPNMPKPJJ5F6BMHVOS3HRN6VLQIU6UGO
X-Message-ID-Hash: KPNMPKPJJ5F6BMHVOS3HRN6VLQIU6UGO
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-v6ops.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Reply-To: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>
Subject: [v6ops] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd-07
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/kxZ5Wk7tI2upgH2SCv4HFSi9tRk>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:v6ops-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:v6ops-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:v6ops-leave@ietf.org>
Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd Title: IPv6 CE Routers LAN Prefix Delegation Reviewer: Kyle Rose Review result: Ready While I would also replace the second appearance of "larger" with respect to prefixes (in the introduction, "prefixes larger"), I note and appreciate the change to "larger address blocks" in the first appearance. Otherwise, I have no follow-up comments beyond thanking the authors for taking my review into account.
- [v6ops] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-v6op… Kyle Rose via Datatracker
- [v6ops] Re: [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of… Michael Richardson