IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-dhc-pd-exclude

jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Thu, 15 December 2011 12:49 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF02221F86A5 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 04:49:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.508
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.508 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.091, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YZH3eZV87YLj for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 04:49:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2318B21F86A1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 04:49:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by laah2 with SMTP id h2so997254laa.31 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 04:49:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=PboR7NFnLmHiujFlUXxczHrKP6gfaKwU5lT2+sav2dg=; b=IPpnk+fa6u0l7e+e46C3Be2ZU2PNlImEhK/ZEPylQrx22GYBJd5ao1HUBZ3orXYkA/ 87pYyRQMMDJcPW98unDrunxQYsFAn6ruNTo25OWqeiaiWJX7Uj1XUPnVbsvnSNfS4OTO XGTAZdwHpSO/JDH6sS6LpOPLgfKcB/3CYaYpw=
Received: by 10.152.102.196 with SMTP id fq4mr2502705lab.26.1323953371106; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 04:49:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from a88-112-207-66.elisa-laajakaista.fi (a88-112-207-66.elisa-laajakaista.fi. [88.112.207.66]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id pc8sm5257965lab.8.2011.12.15.04.49.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 15 Dec 2011 04:49:29 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <265AF202-ECDD-46D9-959F-193D73129FBA@steffann.nl>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:49:35 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DAAEC9FF-E69B-4AA8-86B8-CFC260E37C67@gmail.com>
References: <CABmgDzR9eVRaUJOAcf_TXcXVJJfWk5kof7JvEMpWmTwcpktxCg@mail.gmail.com> <OF51F6250C.40961A0F-ON85257961.005889C2-85257961.0058C1A7@videotron.com> <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C3038291E2@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com> <20111209162751.GL72014@Space.Net> <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C3038291F1@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com> <20111209163935.GM72014@Space.Net> <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C303829251@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com> <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C30382943B@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com> <CAKD1Yr3Lu9ENa7kuEMgu7e-36OPg4iB3VxD7QvKPN8=Ykvfg6A@mail.gmail.com> <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C3038298F6@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com> <92DE244D-4F26-4CF9-98F0-2DB90CED4A43@steffann.nl> <00F796E0-82BE-4B26-8450-2BB42115B19A@gmail.com> <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C3038E528F@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com> <CAKD1Yr0ngNaoOYJ86RoozZv+mZfb8dKXyEPP9NhgJHE4VLz=dQ@mail.gmail.com> <73C15E41-A377-4094-86BD-62B4BD9E8AB6@gmail.com> <265AF202-ECDD-46D9-959F-193D73129FBA@steffann.nl>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org Operations" <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-dhc-pd-exclude
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:49:33 -0000

Right, I'll massage a new introduction text to pd-exclude based on the below sentence.

- Jouni


On Dec 14, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Sander Steffann wrote:

> Hi,
> 
>> "The solution provided in this document is intended for use in networks where each RR is on its own layer 2 domain."
>> 
>> Any better?
> 
> Much better :-)
> Sander
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email