IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Question on multi-homed nodes and address/route selection

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 02 March 2017 16:31 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A3F1294CD for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 08:31:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a8hy_k_LjXN3 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 08:31:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x236.google.com (mail-pg0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CB0D12956C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 08:31:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x236.google.com with SMTP id s67so33864202pgb.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 08:31:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=5BJuZzCxnQ0UnYhRplRyYRtayVmjQp19SDN2OW+Axeo=; b=VVF9EOnyjoHF1kp9yT83TxxuYcMla7PT5IKpOmYcFd5gmDV4GmyLzxdRp4nzubrnkK l/Jp5WVTA6qjYEE2jkwgZrRYnx15WP7H7Bu8fipepBmFdGA1IMxO6RYFYmjtkbb9yEsg yqynQfFLAwYEGkpcksqssfP0MzXgzh7rOHjPmUwu2eY7j3yj3BM/9loMTjieWw8TJAlE tXEDV2OXm/13VHRo1YRmOvsK1Rp7H5Gbtv7h67nh9s2+TCyT+u2ForsMDN1Wsz5bDdiu gFtsSzJv2Ss5k4Jl0P0AdF3OcpCfKjl9auRO+magKQeyPXHPUfX7zBIzuIUuIeiDdE5x 17fQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=5BJuZzCxnQ0UnYhRplRyYRtayVmjQp19SDN2OW+Axeo=; b=ZakBEKQ5w5uzN1Oftm45MKZJWy7BXs85SB4gO/+Elo701wYp2oIJQAti3ylsOxRO2t LD7vDTlLiYvOC34km6vVOq2INwqkHMlBj7HYswDY2ALsUMEX9vfhb2M7BkKFs0OkC1V9 73dXldAqPhimgVoX7EtJzy5kOQd0YxmMU/CbBcWaY2+8kvCOLTxf+tjezejwvwxCI1l7 eYuah+OkXbZYcV93vaulOkURGsu8L5B9OZ22fvqhqbob38kLIJqKOJ88Hj7i5Vp1+TtL LWLMYSfq9tvDRwl5VYTkDmlkxWLYYxEA9OX+Qz7qgmSR0MXjzUPWirZVr1HRBSNxwyTU S61w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nuNben6zXVaom9G+ZhkRMMVl4nEszipHdcnEL0UZFodNHwu8lLZH4vywrhYePCFw==
X-Received: by 10.84.141.129 with SMTP id 1mr19999640plv.166.1488472281750; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 08:31:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.15] (wsip-184-191-158-59.sd.sd.cox.net. [184.191.158.59]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h25sm11314727pfk.119.2017.03.02.08.31.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Mar 2017 08:31:20 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CC646EAB-3175-4A6E-A6EC-0623198C2C9F@employees.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 08:31:19 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <38FD32ED-C942-40AA-8FC7-365A244AB7C9@gmail.com>
References: <E969A0C5-46E5-4B58-BDEB-AE686D76210F@thehobsons.co.uk> <013B7A75-E5F6-4F47-9D92-33114F1781F8@cisco.com> <B1BBBF51-2B5D-4E65-BB23-1D1A52C1A183@thehobsons.co.uk> <CC646EAB-3175-4A6E-A6EC-0623198C2C9F@employees.org>
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>, Simon Hobson <linux@thehobsons.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/mMcqemOcu9U5D7fWyuIS0UNKg4w>
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Question on multi-homed nodes and address/route selection
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 16:31:23 -0000

> On Mar 2, 2017, at 6:05 AM, otroan@employees.org wrote:
> 
> (See also the work on Source address dependent routing). Fred Baker has also a few drafts on this topic.

I'm not the only one :-)

Simon, take a look in rtgwg. There is some work happening for source/destination routing in OSPF, IS-IS, BGP, and I believe Babel, and a problem statement being considered for adoption in rtgwg as we speak. The BGP prototype is operational in CERNET2, I'm told.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bowbakova-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-dst-src-routing
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xu-ospf-multi-homing-ipv6
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xu-src-dst-bgp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email