[v6ops] NAT64 performance comparisons

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 14 February 2012 20:02 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D60FC21E80D4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:02:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.419
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.419 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.180, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bi8JNjrTyoQ7 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:02:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E578C21F864B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:02:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iagf6 with SMTP id f6so402003iag.31 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:02:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=o2vXJdwpJUMXo23OpwihdThAKzqII/m406vU2FhZyUk=; b=XztiNd40Y2k4nytK7OgmDRA4K0zQ0rJXVnd5Mk8W53LGOvBOhDzIR2hBc4psNIR9H7 DiCTEj3vWeG/GiSCnmoRX4PlZds5JatIAaQ3gdnjeVVufAUM5MUUThnXlgdE8wcddj4h eYLttB1OL0+kJTD9UKdgn3VH+L0RdTyaru2g4=
Received: by 10.42.156.7 with SMTP id x7mr30225305icw.56.1329249753580; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:02:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [130.216.38.124] (stf-brian.sfac.auckland.ac.nz. [130.216.38.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ak10sm615699igc.6.2012.02.14.12.02.31 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:02:32 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4F3ABDCB.80004@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:02:19 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [v6ops] NAT64 performance comparisons
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:02:35 -0000

On the subject of NAT64, I'v just filed a tech report on some work
done by Se-young Yu under my supervision. It will get an official
library handle soon, but here is an ad hoc URL to be going on with:

http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~brian/IPv4-IPv6coexistenceTechnique-TR.pdf

-- 
Regards
   Brian Carpenter