[v6ops] Updated draft-byrne-v6ops-clatip-01
"cb.list6" <cb.list6@gmail.com> Sun, 05 January 2014 15:00 UTC
Return-Path: <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F4301AEA80 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Jan 2014 07:00:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.96
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.96 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP=0.001, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.5, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100=1.886, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.922, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m__3FxtMzVf2 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Jan 2014 07:00:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com (mail-wi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD171AEA7F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Jan 2014 07:00:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id hm19so1971872wib.13 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 05 Jan 2014 06:59:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=KsSym3B5UnLwoFk7ceOVZtmRJfUB7TQra4mp1NBrf5w=; b=W3uNfd3zGYuoEkQbTPWOg9R6GmvJWQVb+ThsE2OHODFwyUNEnaCKPlYp6KrndMn1u3 v16YGGAOiT1WXWlwyBQ4VhEVo6Ou1dcvUKaXKeBu2xj0MlVukNlTXmCtRL3AfL4aY+Na IsEloH9LD2TNBA0fgqbSkY71ZNX4gGfG0ozZBDEB9t7ktdhnua9SwejJ90i5sXjlGWDi Etv/pi/oZaxFTGAdbXGklTb5dSa/AUDMwiAAAIrLJRWNgPodEjaW4+wenXxdeBgjJc1I J82Bk5tl5WN+DzZSD5fULMjo1kn45IthPBMNlI7Gh2h5N00H4nZsUIHxxZllwyIr1Kk7 5pkA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.178.135 with SMTP id cy7mr14044855wjc.21.1388933998615; Sun, 05 Jan 2014 06:59:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.217.58.133 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Jan 2014 06:59:58 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2014 06:59:58 -0800
Message-ID: <CAD6AjGQYs8qdZX4qnr8tSqtMe0jpkaD=sHuKxuj1AYj0w9-RPA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "cb.list6" <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013d1dd49aa1f604ef3a65f1"
Subject: [v6ops] Updated draft-byrne-v6ops-clatip-01
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2014 15:00:08 -0000
Hi folks, I have updated draft-byrne-v6ops-clatip-01. From Vancouver, i took the feedback that the main message of this draft should be that we are generalizing the reservation 192.0.0.0/29 from only DS-lite to any IPv6 transition technology that does not require putting packets on-the-wire, yet needs to provide a locally unique ipv4 address to a local host. Please have a look, and let me know if we can move this forward as a WG document and then finally IANA action. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-byrne-v6ops-clatip-01 Thanks, Cameron