IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Load Balancing for Mobile IP

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Wed, 25 March 2009 15:06 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE6628C15C for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:06:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.503, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kw713doUptFg for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:06:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D1328C139 for <v6ops-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:06:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>) id 1LmUg1-0007HY-LO for v6ops-data0@psg.com; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:05:57 +0000
Received: from [171.71.176.71] (helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <fred@cisco.com>) id 1LmUfw-0007H0-Fl for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:05:54 +0000
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.38,419,1233532800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="146423535"
Received: from sj-dkim-1.cisco.com ([171.71.179.21]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Mar 2009 15:05:15 +0000
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n2PF5E1P012068; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:05:14 -0700
Received: from dhcp-56c8.meeting.ietf.org ([10.21.72.80]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2PF5Dcv013956; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:05:13 GMT
Cc: Mark Smith <ipng@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, mext-chairs <mext-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, mip4-chairs <mip4-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>, RonBonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, mext-ads <mext-ads@tools.ietf.org>
Message-Id: <99BA145C-963E-40D6-B0E6-D4C6F0EE8286@cisco.com>
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
To: luowanming <luowanming@cnnic.cn>
In-Reply-To: <437944267.31274@cnnic.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-28--159207612"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Subject: Re: Load Balancing for Mobile IP
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:05:13 -0700
References: <A16EEC0B-822C-44BA-B875-0D9AA6BE7A00@cisco.com>, <49C7FB72.5020104@it.uc3m.es>, <0C2F04C3-1091-4C82-9F10-0F0675508A93@cisco.com>, <49C80401.1040809@it.uc3m.es>, <A9295D76-089E-49E3-BF91-573AA668D8DF@cisco.com>, <49C80678.6080508@it.uc3m.es>, <5801C1F3-B267-41EC-8A44-11C6A419851F@cisco.com>, <437894020.05666@cnnic.cn>, <437903642.25246@cnnic.cn>, <437914297.05677@cnnic.cn> <437944267.31274@cnnic.cn>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=5049; t=1237993514; x=1238857514; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1004; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20Load=20Balancing=20for=20Mobile=20IP |Sender:=20; bh=9rS+prlXeWU34ol54HmywoG186flp1BgWtclZjlPCoE=; b=srH2J38m6BihbeLg447Cnr7utW6cgblwmdDHrQWmq+nerzEmisPcbEVLN3 0gyDitmYSnwsbDMjnXv3XAFvFNjdQ10HqXHABydbeEi45HByEFQkKoieMlFW 4xgIsD3cM4boR66ujqNW2K2cvmvp4GuWt/+1gygQH9mYIu4V94Lkk=;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=fred@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; );
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <v6ops.ops.ietf.org>

I think the problem is well-enough described. You really need to talk  
with Marcello

On Mar 24, 2009, at 6:24 PM, luowanming wrote:

> Hi Fred,
>
> According to your opinion, do we need a new draft to provide a  
> problem statement? If true, I want to work it together with Mark and  
> you.
>
> Regards,
> Wanming Luo
>
>
> 发件人： Fred Baker
> 发送时间： 2009-03-25  01:04:57
> 收件人： luowanming
> 抄送： Mark Smith; IPv6 Operations; mext-chairs; mip4-chairs; Kurt  
> Erik Lindqvist; RonBonica; mext-ads; draft-luo-v6ops-6man-shim6-lbam
> 主题： Re: Load Balancing for Mobile IP
> On Mar 24, 2009, at 7:07 AM, luowanming wrote:
> > So, what is the next step for this draft? Maybe it needs some
> > modifications according to comments? or move to mext WG? or jointly
> > worked by v6ops and Mobile IP?
> In this context, I would expect v6ops to provide a problem statement,
> and mext to provide a solution. I think Mark summarized the problem
> statement, although Marcello may want it in more detail. In my
> opinion, the logical next step for a proposed solution is discussion
> in mext.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email