Re: [v6ops] Revised I-D: Advice on RA-Guard Implementation
Joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Mon, 09 January 2012 17:03 UTC
Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4BAC21F86EA for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 09:03:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4BLjbQO-ywjy for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 09:03:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5407D21F86CC for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 09:03:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Joels-MacBook-Pro.local (host-64-47-136-190.masergy.com [64.47.136.190]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q09H3FlK052073 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:03:16 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <4F0B1DCF.8070608@bogus.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 09:03:11 -0800
From: Joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
References: <4F04F5CA.6010802@si6networks.com> <4269EA985EACD24987D82DAE2FEC62E504DA8736@XMB-AMS-101.cisco.com> <20120106110948.GD72014@Space.Net>
In-Reply-To: <20120106110948.GD72014@Space.Net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:03:17 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Revised I-D: Advice on RA-Guard Implementation
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:03:21 -0000
On 1/6/12 03:09 , Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 10:29:10AM +0100, Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve) wrote: >> RA-Guard is a poor-man solution for access networks against rogue >> RA's... the grown up solution is SeND. > > We need both. SeND won't help if network participants are not able > to prime their machines with the certificates needed to authenticate RAs. > > Think IETF networks... Think any network where no pre-existing relationship exists. > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster
- [v6ops] Revised I-D: Advice on RA-Guard Implement… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] Revised I-D: Advice on RA-Guard Imple… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [v6ops] Revised I-D: Advice on RA-Guard Imple… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] Revised I-D: Advice on RA-Guard Imple… Simon Perreault
- Re: [v6ops] Revised I-D: Advice on RA-Guard Imple… Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)
- Re: [v6ops] Revised I-D: Advice on RA-Guard Imple… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] Revised I-D: Advice on RA-Guard Imple… Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)
- Re: [v6ops] Revised I-D: Advice on RA-Guard Imple… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Revised I-D: Advice on RA-Guard Imple… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] Revised I-D: Advice on RA-Guard Imple… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] Revised I-D: Advice on RA-Guard Imple… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] Revised I-D: Advice on RA-Guard Imple… Joel jaeggli
- Re: [v6ops] Revised I-D: Advice on RA-Guard Imple… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Revised I-D: Advice on RA-Guard Imple… Simon Perreault
- Re: [v6ops] Revised I-D: Advice on RA-Guard Imple… Fernando Gont