IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] An Update to Happy Eyeballs

Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-6@u-1.phicoh.com> Mon, 13 March 2017 12:49 UTC

Return-Path: <pch-bF054DD66@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72CAF1295CE for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 05:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UvcGUZUJufU0 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 05:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (stereo6-tun.hq.phicoh.net [IPv6:2001:888:1044:10:2a0:c9ff:fe9f:17a9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D471295C6 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 05:49:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net ([::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by stereo.hq.phicoh.net with esmtp (Smail #127) id m1cnPPa-0000H0C; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 13:49:18 +0100
Message-Id: <m1cnPPa-0000H0C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
From: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-6@u-1.phicoh.com>
Sender: pch-bF054DD66@u-1.phicoh.com
References: <148899860042.20118.391380898590855642.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <A609BABB-BDF2-4CCB-8452-F489C019748C@apple.com> <m1clvfj-0000FCC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <ABE752F6-895B-431C-9E94-E0CD2FDDB2E3@apple.com> <m1cmTQX-0000IcC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <92EEB875-288D-4CF9-B81F-3B5C8EA49F53@apple.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 12 Mar 2017 20:53:13 -0700 ." <92EEB875-288D-4CF9-B81F-3B5C8EA49F53@apple.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 13:49:16 +0100
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/poHFUD5oseT-lRCHfmSOhBQizO0>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] An Update to Happy Eyeballs
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:49:31 -0000

> 
>    We've incorporated them into -01, please let us know if they
>    were properly addressed.

In my opinion, there is no justification for declaring a single threaded
C application that uses getaddrinfo non-compliant.

So this draft doesn't address my concerns. Just calling getaddrinfo should
be enough.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email