[v6ops] Some IPv6 related drafts in OPSEC WG
KK <kk@google.com> Sat, 28 July 2012 00:34 UTC
Return-Path: <kkumar@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243BD11E810C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 17:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.362
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.362 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EDwj5dseFFUu for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 17:34:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676C411E8107 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 17:34:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lagv3 with SMTP id v3so2531964lag.31 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 17:34:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :x-system-of-record; bh=2kHtdbVGB9N+e+if//H5rjP4TZcMZBgg0iQrM8P9ng8=; b=lL4yPzzj3MnIgDWzB6e1QfQhjxNAYu/SYhcTekmMeqVMp/Mau0Npf+kRAOBKyf7W83 BICgpz97wwnzOliPjKNQk7Ae7C68bYw/oAETSbOLIVbUvLkkwvNzcU2vTpAp6wkOm+5K H/RE5rKh77T2QXjNSiXbqHPvOcdLg5jzaKew5DDI4ZmGsGJA4T5hB8Bl7bFFBZUBbwXk UXzDRl09UEHTGK/N+t2SCKjgqvJ5h8yvPzJNJHqxzTje5CnAfvf50x+MVs9ObgZuU7wm RyQncB84HHnIgJm6BclAaeDvwg45oNykHSh8HXmrJCu3/YF0S/MiBqN7rkyq7oRHHlFx VYYw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :x-system-of-record:x-gm-message-state; bh=2kHtdbVGB9N+e+if//H5rjP4TZcMZBgg0iQrM8P9ng8=; b=Fk+UVc2szvStkhEfs84L+7Um/8BjjTEZE6MeH4HBdbURCYxekya8daYYvo2KSZ50f1 mPPAfvLjxQW7V+Dol7Zqa2OvuKtLpPa0+XQEgsp3I3oL++sl0PdzM6N+cw/vnzYEGkrl W+6m9bY5c+WvCA4DxfvYjUsn3pcAr0ifwSvsI8DV97Z6jTn2uzBo0yJCrsEDJjlI/Guw fV6DmAew8HhR5XDUv+2TA8Ful7C1E5gxleneOKQVtz4ejzYMKbBVNvbMCcOL2hVJrY8G t0maTImlIIEdci0/ZKdNQ166+XN8EAeao2G6uXcILxT2l3mCzJ8aZZxiaWCTr5Mo+EhJ sPEg==
Received: by 10.112.85.42 with SMTP id e10mr2112889lbz.17.1343435693285; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 17:34:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.85.42 with SMTP id e10mr2112885lbz.17.1343435693154; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 17:34:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.116.2 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 17:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: KK <kk@google.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 17:34:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKaj4uRdQbD-HAupXg0+q8LrjM379m_VKFbRaGV-5wRfe1xY6A@mail.gmail.com>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d04016dcf44e18304c5d8ff31"
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl7SDKanhLLrs5onZfoE5rDlty+R0io05v69J4zZOErC1KXJc7PhCYzRE5z4Z3e+AtX8zdWn4mhASMcU2HPXOcT34BxcBIcTKow5YoF00isoXSI5+8q/iTjzK9dCouqTZlLpVCo1w+3X8QT0ynaGrmRNa3S5yXbiKild250D4Ax6zVFBaw=
Cc: opsec chairs <opsec-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [v6ops] Some IPv6 related drafts in OPSEC WG
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 00:34:55 -0000
Hi All, There are some new and/or updated IPv6 related drafts in the opsec WG that could use some additional review from folks in v6ops. http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning/ http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets/ http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gont-opsec-dhcpv6-shield/ http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-nd-shield/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vyncke-opsec-v6/ The agenda for opsec's Wednesday session can be found at http://tools.ietf.org/wg/opsec/agenda. Thanks, KK