IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-07: (with COMMENT)

Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> Thu, 04 April 2024 07:23 UTC

Return-Path: <furry13@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2502C151534; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 00:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1zxH7Rf_lufL; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 00:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x229.google.com (mail-lj1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::229]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E8E7C151532; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 00:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x229.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2d475b6609eso8335981fa.2; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 00:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712215385; x=1712820185; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=7efrauULPvH12P+5YOijS9zmuZBwQc1bdkS7cjYgJa4=; b=Egc8wAAgFygog60io+iNcNu/TJAVgeBqQ5wOKYwgpOPgHVixpYqF02qke3xi8MbnVZ 1I2VErWJy/5S61jXKfkzPBLAQh0LyHAjR9vHDPP7kl69vLPtmCEzTKLC6sgbtounWWFv uyhap0ArZG8HdnnvfIJExYo/9jMNN+R63tjFaPCoIglUS3Db9pFexrVcTB9Qbex221BO d5T++5/QKynJTk5mcPEYI5KiZkxzJMp/41hTg9uLWVL6/m6PUBIrUW25xpzus7lkenzw hfiVk7m5AsPTjCFWrQD6UMFE7D+HUwfPsMXxwoUCx2iYjfRx9zL/mrznKHFowvGfeP7X OROQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712215385; x=1712820185; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7efrauULPvH12P+5YOijS9zmuZBwQc1bdkS7cjYgJa4=; b=Iag3ZSQyohKSTIq5xqKi9C/pfJAV9v0q+UPtCk29lwmL2y+v31yHvC0J+G5Iu2x43B 3LfM4JxXXMXRp+ChuMykbIcrtoU6FNaGQEXPraox4H78dGhzjRfapQKJKYDHDbvCIFJZ J3JLKcXrFT/zFpdbr2SGNjTK+Kb3IoIsMLvQ2vLzKUwi3tskPPlXsVEm7y/zDNaENNDh ARvnbfwace4gyWlIAYxlbAW0XIycajCWbkVWpnAXPgHYCtdGySQMs+oKuJThu6LHoUNc 8DyLCNoIPawWc2hm72EOHBmK98vSkKr+w2eM8Wc8kUJjjO2hksaUqfSwlPURC45VBFVy M+3A==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWdQsuZAciCWE/QHrM4nV1+OoeuUHCwUPPHQrd7J82v/ucJ0hI1XT8wmrCDZBUcKdT7mvQhi7pR1vkmvHQKdqmxo6rs6MYCn1x6rubmh20vck9fFJfd/yzUPclA8qn0j+IMOpfamKiZuZn2p3wdMWr4qezmjftDNZ9Lo3N0FBUBF5SRkw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YznPW6YSqor7QOsyaXK8YUEJ0eYCJH6fuFF0LqYQivot4auMH1M EQFwC4vB4/4iTrofovbVuGNVqWHobNAvaw5fm5RcZ+zDpTweeSBVekEeKW88Av4FLf6/kxgDEJ1 GKpGawu1t5dfT0bl22SGlcqJ9FKQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGGf7e7Q0onBggDlmrtA/dnEqN3cK91x8xt43zdWJCNuioxVcBV3THrJ0yFx9EZ8burhKj+HDIvbcBkewQ4gsc=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9610:0:b0:2d8:45fc:c9d6 with SMTP id v16-20020a2e9610000000b002d845fcc9d6mr1349918ljh.45.1712215385026; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 00:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <171218230136.43146.1002666396421346056@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <171218230136.43146.1002666396421346056@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 18:22:53 +1100
Message-ID: <CAFU7BAQTjpo5rxn3dR686uagnv_wNSj3WASV5+tkM5GpA1PtmQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device@ietf.org, v6ops-chairs@ietf.org, v6ops@ietf.org, tim@qacafe.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/saAVXQGBlknL1PNVkZEGuHNf3rs>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 07:23:08 -0000

Hi Roman,

Thank you for your comments.

On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 9:11 AM Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
<noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> ** Section 13.
>
>    Networks that use the proposed mechanism instead of SLAAC or in
>    addition to SLAAC, SHOULD minimally:
>
> ...
>
>    *  Use short prefix lifetimes, to ensure that when a client
>       disconnects and reconnects it gets a different prefix.
>
> Is there any guidance to provide on what constitutes a “short lifetime”?

We've updated the text ("(e.g., hours)).

>
> ** Section 13.
>    To provide privacy roughly equivalent to SLAAC with temporary
>    addresses ([RFC8981]), the network SHOULD ...
>
> I’m having trouble understanding this guidance.  What should be done to provide
> SLAAC-privacy-equivalence if this guidance isn’t followed?  There are multiple
> SHOULDs in this paragraph.  Wouldn’t it be mandatory to follow them to provide
> SLAAC-privacy-equivalence?

Thank you for pointing this out, the text was a bit unclear, I agree.

We've rephrased that section, please let me know if the text in 08
doesn't address your comment.

-- 
Cheers, Jen Linkova

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email