IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [3gv6] Stateless Prefix Delegation I-D updated (draft-savolainen-stateless-pd)

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Tue, 02 March 2010 18:49 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A011128C22E for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:49:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e7WYzXH0yggZ for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:49:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D30573A8BFE for <v6ops-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:49:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>) id 1NmX5t-0002NL-Jp for v6ops-data0@psg.com; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:45:21 +0000
Received: from [2a00:801::217:8ff:fe5b:81eb] (helo=uplift.swm.pp.se) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <swmike@swm.pp.se>) id 1NmX5r-0002N2-10 for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:45:19 +0000
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 1DB0D9E; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 19:45:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB819C; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 19:45:17 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:45:17 +0100
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Konrad Rosenbaum <konrad@silmor.de>
cc: teemu.savolainen@nokia.com, v6ops@ops.ietf.org, otroan@employees.org, 3gv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [3gv6] Stateless Prefix Delegation I-D updated (draft-savolainen-stateless-pd)
In-Reply-To: <ab1c41801a9af836af3e300b4d3a6cce.squirrel@squirrel.six.silmor.de>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1003021943420.11822@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <1267309761.3168.5.camel@Nokia-N900-51-1> <08c08ee106e47b366ab18ca2f0a9a722.squirrel@squirrel.six.silmor.de> <18034D4D7FE9AE48BF19AB1B0EF2729F589C9BCEE7@NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com> <ab1c41801a9af836af3e300b4d3a6cce.squirrel@squirrel.six.silmor.de>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <v6ops.ops.ietf.org>

On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:

> However the Access Concentrator has to deal with a paradoxical 
> situation: several overlapping routes. If we assume the AC has host-ID 
> ::1 and the CPE device or mobile phone has ::2:

Hm, I don't really endorse this model (I prefer the WAN interface 
unnumbered model), but I don't understand why this overlapping routes 
situation is paradoxical?

Longest prefix routing is the norm on the Internet and should handle this 
just fine?

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email