[v6ops] Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-framework-md-ipv6only-underlay-13 (Ends 2025-10-08)

[Brian E Carpenter <[e-mail]>]

I have read this draft again and I believe it is ready.

One tiny point: this draft doesn't mention draft-ietf-v6ops-6mops, and 6mops doesn't mention ipv6only-underlay. I think it would be useful to clarify the relationship between the two documents; since 6mops is still being developed, perhaps it belongs there.

Regards/Ngā mihi
    Brian Carpenter

On 25-Sep-25 09:24, Nick Buraglio via Datatracker wrote:
> 
> Subject: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-framework-md-ipv6only-underlay-13
> (Ends 2025-10-08)
> 
> This message starts a 2-week WG Last Call for this document.
> 
> Abstract:
>     For the IPv6 transition, IPv6-only is considered as the final stage,
>     where only IPv6 protocol is used for transport while maintaining
>     global reachability for both IPv6 and IPv4 services.  This document
>     illustrates a framework of multi-domain IPv6-only underlay network
>     from an operator's perspective.  In particular, it proposes stateless
>     address mapping as the base for enabling IPv4 service data
>     transmission in an multi-domain IPv6-only environment(i.e.,IPv4-as-
>     a-Service).  It describes the methodology of stateless IPv4/IPv6
>     mapping, illustrates the behaviors of network devices, analyzes the
>     options of IPv6 mapping prefix allocation, examines the utilization
>     of SRv6, and discusses the security considerations.
> 
> File can be retrieved from:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-framework-md-ipv6only-underlay/
> 
> Please review and indicate your support or objection to proceed with the
> publication of this document by replying to this email keeping [e-mail]
> in copy. Objections should be motivated and suggestions to resolve them are
> highly appreciated.
> 
> Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded again of the
> Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79
> [1]. Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the
> provisions of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of
> any. Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can
> be found at [3].
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/
> [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]