Teredo WGLC

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 15 January 2009 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB1628C28E for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:43:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.442
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.442 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.947, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x16HXl3pwJlz for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:43:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E1028C29C for <v6ops-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:43:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>) id 1LNX62-000DAn-BV for v6ops-data0@psg.com; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:37:38 +0000
Received: from [171.71.176.117] (helo=sj-iport-6.cisco.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <fred@cisco.com>) id 1LNX5w-000DAL-Rx for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:37:35 +0000
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.37,271,1231113600"; d="scan'208";a="230600096"
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Jan 2009 18:37:29 +0000
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n0FIbTTR023554; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:37:29 -0800
Received: from xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-231.cisco.com [128.107.191.100]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0FIbTEX013833; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:37:29 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.174]) by xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:37:23 -0800
Received: from [42.221.85.66] ([10.21.126.95]) by xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:37:23 -0800
Message-Id: <17CD10D1-40D8-40B7-8177-4B7768068AD9@cisco.com>
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Subject: Teredo WGLC
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:37:23 -0800
Cc: kurtis@kurtis.pp.se, rbonica@juniper.net
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jan 2009 18:37:23.0670 (UTC) FILETIME=[4E93EF60:01C97740]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=800; t=1232044649; x=1232908649; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Teredo=20WGLC |Sender:=20; bh=LwfPtrcrG6svYRRW5HMPuQ5lO2UlTeYqPP0eHmBzHGY=; b=IdO8CwYtY9NtKkuzVP6mXIcygCFhkJ1O8dK7WdhBgnxcf/5HPcUTPbEd3i fiVVw0tSthw0HkHQhltf/eptXzzURdbl3WvjtgCE5LHSxyrNfm1dt+Br2ykV /ehEeCv4wX;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=fred@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; );
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <v6ops.ops.ietf.org>

This is to initiate a two week working group last call of draft- 
krishnan-v6ops-teredo-update-04.txt and draft-thaler-v6ops-teredo- 
extensions-02.txt. Please read it now. If you find nits (spelling  
errors, minor suggested wording changes, etc), comment to the authors;  
if you find greater issues, such as disagreeing with a statement or  
finding additional issues that need to be addressed, please post your  
comments to the list.

We are *not* reviewing draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-security- 
concerns-01.txt. Comments on that are invited, but in intarea.

We are looking specifically for comments on the importance of the  
document as well as its content. If you have read the document and  
believe it to be of operational utility, that is also an important  
comment to make.