Re: [v6ops] Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers - implementation-dependency

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Mon, 27 July 2020 10:13 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD053A183D; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 03:13:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HSdHZD7CsU6x; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 03:13:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6017D3A1836; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 03:13:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2800:810:464:1f7:4ccc:6def:a83b:96ef] (unknown [IPv6:2800:810:464:1f7:4ccc:6def:a83b:96ef]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B37052838A4; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 10:13:19 +0000 (UTC)
To: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops@ietf.org" <draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops@ietf.org>
References: <daa1c0efd47f47cfa9c2cffe4c917930@huawei.com> <3f135d04-7db1-39fa-07ea-2da190f2665d@si6networks.com> <b4c3f28a26d04d22b2d48e0240d10c9d@huawei.com>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Message-ID: <45f6f88e-0c8f-e049-69ea-0b26944247ae@si6networks.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 07:13:13 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <b4c3f28a26d04d22b2d48e0240d10c9d@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/uBc-LcB3_16tP88pamiRc7bDo6c>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers - implementation-dependency
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 10:13:29 -0000

On 27/7/20 07:01, Vasilenko Eduard wrote:
>>> What would you expect us to cover in such section, other than what we already cover in Section 5.1.1. (Packet Forwarding Engine Constraints)?
> It is better to move this story into separate section before security discussion.
> Make this story visible.

Point taken. We will try to discuss this stuff much earlier in the draft.

Thanks!

Cheers,
Fernando




-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492