Re: [v6ops] Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 04 December 2014 19:32 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5165D1A0174 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 11:32:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mD-e8ZM2HXWC for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 11:32:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22a.google.com (mail-pa0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B323C1A0173 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 11:32:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id et14so18630398pad.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 11:32:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=YwzmlBDVmdBudTn3q6YXuP/oRI99UxnLN2Q5KKtmAus=; b=n2TSeDgMZtdftxSQGxs7V1OKPQhyXnJwN4MO79lLa66nQjtwlj8UNJc7Xsy+Sb5QeU OGODDyWR2aFXLu3GFbfYmVp1RVEeg+gPL2xMovSoZEcP0o2aTRXBjHuKsVRoStgdD4OW M/GvUhXYC0MwdFb+uYeO0tppeQOj6N+3kmfH3jiXBEgOnwTqeSrtQ1Coyhod9nJm9nCJ HmT2L/JkVoA7aKXQ6T9WutkZb7Z3fM3CyYE73CO1YlRl95wG+/e3Uk6WSfEQj0pLWPpZ 4RDxGlVcBsOaltlImgcdsp0nBq6uPsjIgdhEjkUvrOVuGhjmwnT3PgTDu0Xv8O7QhzXL JNpg==
X-Received: by 10.70.128.80 with SMTP id nm16mr8404675pdb.1.1417721572033; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 11:32:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.26] (125.228.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.228.125]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ip2sm26666350pbb.61.2014.12.04.11.32.49 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Dec 2014 11:32:51 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5480B6EA.1060305@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 08:32:58 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
References: <20141201223832.20448.34524.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <EA67CE71-1C1F-407A-92F6-3D7235FDBD6E@nominum.com> <9BF7829A-C434-434F-9E23-838B2CD906F7@steffann.nl> <547F3631.7060606@globis.net> <D987742D-23D9-4CF7-B1D0-748002D4A4F8@steffann.nl> <547F4D95.7030706@globis.net> <547F665E.2070804@gmail.com> <5478E4C2-D709-4EFD-BC86-A5068576DAE3@steffann.nl> <547F8D9C.80608@gmail.com> <m21togc84y.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m21togc84y.wl%randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/uCk4i8Mm2xRv4hHJX9tzNdtgT0A
Cc: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 19:32:54 -0000

On 04/12/2014 18:10, Randy Bush wrote:
>> We are stuck with kludges until the IPv4-only sites go away, but
>> IMHO we should be encouraging kludges that bring IPv6 into play.
> 
> you may want to actually read 6346, say 3.1.7, 4.1, ...  

I apologise, I had indeed forgotten the SMAP stuff. Probably the last
time I actually read the whole thing was when draft-ymbk-aplusp was
in Last Call.

> and, in fact, 6346 was written specifically to offer alternatives to
> cgn, e.g. see 1.1.

Sure. I understand that.

   Brian