Re: [v6ops] draft-steffann-tunnels-02.txt

Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> Fri, 29 March 2013 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <owen@delong.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC7521F8910 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 10:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.15
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.15 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2e16D0cNoc+e for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 10:51:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from owen.delong.com (owen.delong.com [IPv6:2620:0:930::200:2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E76921F890F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 10:51:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2620::930:0:ca2a:14ff:fe3e:d024] ([IPv6:2620:0:930:0:ca2a:14ff:fe3e:d024]) (authenticated bits=0) by owen.delong.com (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r2THmsGh020455 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 29 Mar 2013 10:48:55 -0700
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 owen.delong.com r2THmsGh020455
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=delong.com; s=mail; t=1364579336; bh=y4zzo28iS1kRlJSmICwCA9w4Fvo=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=4yluzbg+ixtBeBQiSCOJuu54LKX6+enf+DWRFSl0HBTa9xd1YJ2T35twjLqT725eK refkpv+pEFAD1RmmaM0xRl0KHE1AMc25wDy9QVfExu0/9CEl2KWPRYbYjYmG5At930 pimFkKFafziiOtR7zEQn3NB2sBSkMu+Yo+ZOO7zc=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831803F99C@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 10:48:26 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5B96BC3F-5B49-46F0-8551-09C509060A56@delong.com>
References: <20130328155646.15588.7427.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <A0A92FAA-073D-42AA-81D1-AB8D7675C3F0@muada.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831803F99C@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0rc1 (owen.delong.com [IPv6:2620:0:930::200:2]); Fri, 29 Mar 2013 10:48:56 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "draft-steffann-tunnels@tools.ietf.org" <draft-steffann-tunnels@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-steffann-tunnels-02.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 17:51:22 -0000

Agreed... LISP should not be any more emphasized than SEAL et. al.

Owen

On Mar 28, 2013, at 09:19 , "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> wrote:

> Hi Iljitsch,
> 
> In the diffs, I see:
> 
>   Although SEAL [RFC5320] and related protocols (such as VET, RANGER  
>   and IRON) are capable of tunneling IPv6 over IPv4, these protocols  
>   are not discussed in this document because their scope goes well  
>   beyond basic IPv6-in-IPv4 tunneling."
> 
> However, the same is true of LISP (which is looking at IPv4-in-IPv4
> in its current phases). Do you want to de-emphasize LISP also?
> 
> Thanks - Fred
> fred.l.templin@boeing.com
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: v6ops-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>> Iljitsch van Beijnum
>> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 9:05 AM
>> To: v6ops@ietf.org WG
>> Cc: draft-steffann-tunnels@tools.ietf.org
>> Subject: [v6ops] draft-steffann-tunnels-02.txt
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> We've incorporated a number of comments. Please have a look (the diff is
>> handy) and see if everything is to your liking. I think I put in all the
>> names of people who reviewed or had significant comments in the
>> acknowledgments, let us know if I overlooked anyone.
>> 
>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories.
>> 
>>> 	Title           : A Comparison of IPv6 over IPv4 Tunnel Mechanisms
>> 
>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-steffann-tunnels
>> 
>>> There's also a htmlized version available at:
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-steffann-tunnels-02
>> 
>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-steffann-tunnels-02
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops