IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-04 WGLC

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Wed, 15 April 2009 20:36 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E00B3A6F3A for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.389
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.389 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.106, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ao-ZGIip3Scj for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D8F33A6F3F for <v6ops-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>) id 1LuBpd-000OxE-Fh for v6ops-data0@psg.com; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:35:41 +0000
Received: from [64.102.122.148] (helo=rtp-iport-1.cisco.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <fred@cisco.com>) id 1LuBpP-000OwZ-0x for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:35:34 +0000
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.40,194,1238976000"; d="scan'208";a="42002227"
Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Apr 2009 20:35:26 +0000
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n3FKZPkT002990; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:35:25 -0400
Received: from dhcp-64-100-227-211.cisco.com (dhcp-64-100-227-211.cisco.com [64.100.227.211]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3FKZPH4027017; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:35:25 GMT
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
Message-Id: <60154BF4-D079-4C9B-AE03-C28421C275B2@cisco.com>
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
To: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <6EA5BC8A-B3F3-4E08-9C2C-B331B3AA5447@apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-04 WGLC
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:35:24 -0400
References: <32129337-7BED-4D7A-AF06-BC5ABB37D994@cisco.com> <B00EDD615E3C5344B0FFCBA910CF7E1D06F193F4@xmb-rtp-20e.amer.cisco.com> <6EA5BC8A-B3F3-4E08-9C2C-B331B3AA5447@apple.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=714; t=1239827725; x=1240691725; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-04 =20WGLC |Sender:=20 |To:=20james=20woodyatt=20<jhw@apple.com>; bh=CY2Bagay4IGGvFoDtfx9tXPxk1mA4vsi5ixhIOhnhFc=; b=WjNPCY9eo6JynpjWpRTy3XoeznlR/p+4YGAgxQ1y6mRyXMz7minUV9KNCA p0tF/VSCYzADjDMnHeOnQ//TxENEZ+BvNilI0S3JwTl5TPXyJndCEyz4PDvQ o6K3llQ2TP;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1; header.From=fred@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim1001 verified; );
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <v6ops.ops.ietf.org>

Please do in your next revision. I think he argument holds. Barring  
updates as the result of last call comments, I don't think the setting  
in the draft is critical, though. The important point is not whether  
you mark it as standards vs informational tracks; it's what the IESG  
decides.

On Apr 15, 2009, at 4:32 PM, james woodyatt wrote:

> On Apr 15, 2009, at 09:53, Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote:
>>
>> As I requested earlier, this draft should be changed form BCP to  
>> Informational.
>
> If the Working Group chair(s) direct me to change the category, then  
> I'll change it.
>
>
> --
> james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
> member of technical staff, communications engineering
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email