Re: [v6ops] Documentation Prefixes for ULA

[David Farmer <[e-mail]>]

On 3/29/13 17:35 , Owen DeLong wrote:
> This is now an ID available at:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-delong-ula-example-00.txt
>
> Unless there is objection, the next version will incorporate the changes suggested by Iljitsch.

fd00:2001:db8::/48 should remain a valid ULA prefix as defined in RFC 
4193, but you might want to suggest it may be reasonable to establish 
local policy not to use it, even though it remains valid ULA prefix.

> Are there any other changes people would like to see?

As for fc00:2001:db8::/48, I would add something like the follow to what 
you said;

    If fc00::/8 were defined similar to contemplated in
    [draft-ietf-ipv6-ula-central] or [draft-hain-ipv6-ulac],
    fc00:2001:db8::/48 should be reserved in such a registry, if such a
    registry were ever created for fc00::/8.

Where draft-ietf-ipv6-ula-central and draft-hain-ipv6-ulac would be 
Informative References.

Since it has come up, is there any interest in moving forward some from 
of ULA-C?

Owen, has your views on the utility of registered ULA softened?

Thanks

-- 
================================================
David Farmer               Email: [e-mail]
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE     Phone: [phone]
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029  Cell: 1-612-812-9952
================================================