IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] Review of draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary-05

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Sat, 21 August 2010 05:05 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 784AD3A6A1B for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 22:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.489
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.489 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.110, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z7haUvDlBeFO for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 22:05:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80D83A693A for <v6ops-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 22:05:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>) id 1OmgDO-000Ddz-La for v6ops-data0@psg.com; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 05:01:58 +0000
Received: from [2001:418:1::40] (helo=ran.psg.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1OmgDI-000DdB-UC for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 05:01:52 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rmac.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1OmgDA-000KmZ-3U; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 05:01:44 +0000
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 14:01:42 +0900
Message-ID: <m2r5hsmudl.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Smith <ipng@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org>, Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, int-area@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Review of draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary-05
In-Reply-To: <4C6F59E3.4030503@gmail.com>
References: <D74F3837-E115-49FB-A9AB-5E0C53406621@tony.li> <28C4A15C-DE54-4DD2-A5FD-33BFF66EFE83@cisco.com> <20100821105912.65da34e3@opy.nosense.org> <4C6F59E3.4030503@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <v6ops.ops.ietf.org>

> But we have moved on since then, and I believe that 3177bis hits
> the mark fairly accurately (given that we now have DHCPv6 where
> needed).

not exactly.  we have dhcp5.5, as we all know only too well.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email