[v6ops] Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-app-testing-02 (Ends 2026-09-18)

[Nick Buraglio <[e-mail]>]

Thanks, I think we can extend this a week until the authors can address the
comments.

nb

On Thu, Sep 17, 2026 at 8:49 AM Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>
wrote:

>
> Nick Buraglio via Datatracker <[e-mail]> wrote:
>     > This message starts a WG Last Call for:
>     > draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-app-testing-02
>
> I read earlier versions, and participated in the bikeshed on the *only*
> names.  I have re-read the document, and I find it ready.
>
> Section 3.2 seems to imply that TURN can bridge between v4-only and v6-only
> hosts.   I'm unaware of it being able to do that; but maybe I'm just
> ignorant here.
> I want, strangely, to suggest that the Table 2 list might need to
> distinguish
> between IPv4-only with NAT44, and IPv4-only:public address.
> I've seen multiple cases where v4-connectivity does not work if you have
> no NAT!
> (This usually infects v6 connectivity too: but support people often won't
> file tickets for that)
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>            Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
>
> **       My working hours and your working hours may be different.
>  **
> ** Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours
> **
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>